To the editor: These so-called Christians are so offended by any signal of different individuals’s beliefs that they really feel compelled to sue (“Christian engineer sues L.A. County over Pleasure flag show at authorities buildings,” March 11). That looks like judging others, one thing I consider Jesus Christ stated to not do.
I’m wondering in the event that they really feel the identical compulsion on behalf of these with non-Christian religion being compelled to stroll previous the Ten Commandments and crosses in faculties and authorities buildings in sure Southern states.
When will Individuals enable all individuals on this nation the liberty of their spiritual or nonreligious beliefs to be accepted with out judgement or hate?
Rita Skinner, Riverside
..
To the editor: So let me get this straight (pun supposed): A non-marginalized particular person is suing over a flag signifying the inclusion of marginalized individuals as a result of he’s being marginalized as a result of he’s offended by a logo of marginalized individuals? Do I’ve that proper (once more, pun supposed)?
Marta Allen, Huntington Seashore
..
To the editor: One more frivolous lawsuit. As an atheist, maybe I ought to sue for each time I’ve to see a Christian cross. On this nation, I might have fairly the bounty from all of the settlements.
Jan Rasmussen, Lakewood
..
To the editor: Eric Batman, a 24-year veteran of the Division of Public Works, is suing the county as a result of he’s offended by the Pleasure flag hung in entrance of their headquarters. This man feels threatened by a bit of coloured material.
The article additionally references a lifeguard with an analogous lawsuit towards the county. Typically conservatives name liberals who assist what the Pleasure flag represents “snowflakes.” I’m wondering if Mr. Batman or the lifeguard have ever used that time period and if they’d admire the irony.
Pablo Prietto, Los Angeles
