To the editor: Thanks for a balanced, unemotional column concerning the dealing with of the query of how “human” AI is (“In two new court docket circumstances, judges discover that AI doesn’t have human intelligence,” March 6). Maybe I agree with the rulings as a result of that’s how I view AI and wish it to be considered; i.e., it’s a instrument or a complement to our talents, together with these involving creativity.
Perhaps a brand new class of copyright regulation may very well be created involving works created by AI. Because the expertise needs to be fashioned/created/backed by people, at the least at the moment nonetheless, maybe such guardrails may very well be fairly carried out. On the level when AI is extra self-sufficient, nonetheless, then the topic would have to be addressed once more in that context.
Courageous new world we’re dwelling in, eh?
As for the attorney-client privilege declare, as a paralegal in numerous companies over a 30-year interval, I just about see the court docket’s resolution as a slam dunk.
John Snyder, Newbury Park
