Democrats’ caterwauling this week after just a few of their senators caved to finish the federal government shutdown couldn’t utterly drown out one other noise: the sound of President Trump pinballing dumb “coverage” concepts as he flails to answer voters’ unhappiness that his promised Golden Age is proving golden just for him, his household and his donors.
On social media (in fact) and in interviews, the president has been blurting out proposals which might be information even to the advisors who needs to be vetting them first. Rebates of $2,000 for many Individuals and pay-downs of federal debt, all from supposed tariff windfalls. (Don’t rely on both payoff; extra under.) New 50-year mortgages to make home-buying extra inexpensive (not). Docked pay for air site visitors controllers who didn’t present as much as work through the shutdown, with out pay, and $10,000 bonuses for many who did. (He doesn’t have that energy; the federal government isn’t his household enterprise.) Most mind-boggling of all, Trump has resurrected his and Republicans’ long-buried promise to “repeal and change” Obamacare.
It’s been 5 years since he promised a healthcare plan “in two weeks.” It’s been a yr since he stated he had “ideas of a plan” through the 2024 marketing campaign. What he now calls “Trumpcare” (natch) apparently quantities to paying folks to purchase insurance coverage. Particulars to come back, he says, once more.
With all this seat-of-the-pants policymaking, Trump solely underscores the coverage ignorance that’s been a defining trait since he first ran for workplace. No different president in reminiscence put out such knee-jerk junk that’s simply discounted and mocked.
In his first time period, Trump didn’t learn to navigate the legislative course of, and thus steer well-debated concepts into regulation. He didn’t wish to. Much more in his second time period, Trump avoids that deliberative democratic course of, preferring rule by fiat and government order (even when the outcomes don’t outlast your presidency, or they fizzle in court docket). For Trump, concepts don’t percolate, infused with experience and knowledge. They pop into his head.
However diktats will not be at all times potential, because the shutdown dramatized when Republicans couldn’t agree with Democrats on the must-pass laws to maintain the federal government funded.
With Republicans controlling the White Home and Congress (and arguably the Supreme Courtroom: see current selections siding with the Trump administration to dam SNAP advantages), the Democrats had been by no means going to really win the shutdown showdown — not if profitable meant forcing Republicans to agree to increase medical insurance tax credit for hundreds of thousands of Individuals. Increasing healthcare protection has by no means been Republicans’ precedence. Tax cuts are, primarily for the rich and firms, and Republicans pocketed that win months in the past with Trump’s large, ugly invoice, paid for primarily by cuts to Medicaid.
But Democrats gained one thing: They shoved the problem of spiraling healthcare prices again onto politics’ heart stage, the place it joins the broader query of affordability in an economic system that doesn’t work for the working class. Drawing consideration to the merciless priorities of Trump 2.0 is a giant motive that I and plenty of others supported Democrats forcing a shutdown, regardless of the unlikelihood of a coverage “W.” (I didn’t help the Senate Democrats’ caving simply but, not so quickly after Democrats gained bigger-than-expected victories in final week’s off-year elections on the power of their combat for affordability, together with medical insurance.)
The combat isn’t over. The Senate will debate and vote subsequent month on extending tax credit for Obamacare that in any other case expire at yr’s finish, making protection unaffordable for hundreds of thousands of individuals. Even when the Democrats win that vote — unlikely — the subsidies can be DOA within the Home, a MAGA stronghold. What’s not useless, nonetheless, is the problem of rising insurance coverage premiums for all Individuals. It’s teed up for the midterm election campaigns.
Such pocketbook points have thrown Trump on the defensive. The result’s his string of politically tone-deaf remarks and unvetted, out-of-right-field initiatives.
On Monday evening, having invited Fox Information host Laura Ingraham into the White Home for an interview and a tour of his gilt-and-marble renovations, he pooh-poohed her query about Individuals’ nervousness concerning the prices of dwelling with this unpolitic rejoinder: “Greater than the rest, it’s a con job by the Democrats.” When Ingraham, to her credit score, reminded Trump that he’d slammed President Biden for “saying issues had been nice, and issues weren’t nice,” Trump stood his shaky floor, sniping: “Polls are pretend. We now have the best economic system we’ve ever had.” (False.)
On Saturday, Trump had posted that Republicans ought to take cash “from the BIG, BAD Insurance coverage Firms, give it to the folks, and terminate” Obamacare. He instructed Ingraham, “Name it Trumpcare … something however Obamacare.” Healthcare business consultants pounced: Such direct funds may permit youthful, wholesome folks to get cheaper, no-frills protection, however would go away the insurance coverage swimming pools with disproportionately extra ailing folks and, in flip, greater prices.
As for Trump’s promised $2,000 rebates and reductions within the $37 trillion federal debt, he posted early Sunday and once more on Monday that “trillions of {dollars}” from tariffs would make each issues potential quickly. On Tuesday evening, he despatched a fundraising e mail: “Would you are taking a TARIFF rebate verify signed by yours actually?”
Perhaps if he’d talked to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who professed ignorance concerning the concept on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday, Trump would have realized that tariffs up to now yr raised not trillions however $195 billion, considerably much less than $2,000 rebates would price. Not solely would there be nothing to place towards the debt, however rebates would add $6 trillion in crimson ink over 10 years. That may put Trump simply $2 trillion in need of the quantity of debt he added in his first time period.
When Ingraham requested the place he’d get the cash to pay bonuses to air site visitors controllers, Trump was fast with a nonanswer: “I don’t know. I’ll get it from someplace.” And when she instructed him the 50-year mortgage concept “has enraged your MAGA mates,” given the potential windfall of curiosity cost for banks, Trump was equally dismissive: “It’s not even a giant deal.”
Not a giant deal: That’s policymaking, Trump-style.
Bluesky: @jackiecalmes
Threads: @jkcalmes
X: @jackiekcalmes
