South Africa’s highest courtroom has dominated that husbands can take the surname of their wives, overturning a regulation that barred them from doing so.
In a victory for 2 {couples} who introduced the case, the Constitutional Courtroom dominated that the regulation was a “colonial import” that amounted to gender-based discrimination.
Henry van der Merwe was denied the proper to take the surname of his spouse Jana Jordaan, whereas Andreas Nicolas Bornman couldn’t hyphenate his surname to incorporate Donnelly, the surname of his spouse, Jess Donnelly-Bornman, the general public broadcaster, SABC, studies.
Parliament will now should amend the Births and Deaths Registration Act, together with its laws, for the ruling to take impact.
The regulation was launched in South Africa throughout the years of white-minority rule.
Two {couples} had argued that the regulation was archaic and patriarchal, and violated equality rights enshrined within the structure that South Africa adopted on the finish of apartheid in 1994.
They efficiently challenged the regulation in a decrease courtroom, however requested the Constitutional Courtroom to verify its ruling.
The Constitutional Courtroom famous that “in lots of African cultures, girls retained their start names after marriage, and kids usually took their mom’s clan title” however this modified after the “arrival of the European colonisers and Christian missionaries, and the imposition of Western values”.
“The customized {that a} spouse takes the husband’s surname existed in Roman-Dutch regulation, and on this approach was launched into South African widespread regulation.
“This practice additionally got here into existence on account of laws that was launched by nations that colonised African nations south of the Sahara,” the courtroom stated.
It added that South Africa had made a “vital development” in gender equality, however some legal guidelines and practices that perpetuated “dangerous stereotypes” nonetheless remained in place.
Neither the Minister of Residence Affairs Leon Schreiber nor the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Growth Mamoloko Kubayi opposed the 2 {couples}’ utility, as a substitute agreeing that the regulation was outdated.
A authorized physique, the Free State Society of Advocates, joined the courtroom case in assist of the 2 {couples}.
It argued that by proscribing a person’s proper to imagine their spouse’s surname, the regulation perpetuated dangerous stereotypes, because it denied males a selection obtainable to girls, the Sowetan information web site studies.
Extra BBC tales on South Africa:
[Getty Images/BBC]
Go to BBCAfrica.com for extra information from the African continent.
Observe us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Fb at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
BBC Africa podcasts
