To the editor: Visitor contributor Alan Dershowitz says that “freedom of conscience doesn’t imply the liberty to adapt” (“When do legal guidelines towards abuse turn into weapons towards religion?,” Oct. 9). Following your conscience and being autonomous is American. We are able to’t punish folks for his or her perception methods. As Dershowitz notes, George Washington promised that our new nation would “give to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no help.”
Within the late Nineteen Sixties, my father and I have been discussing faith whereas driving on a New Mexico nation street lined by posts and barbed-wire fences. He turned to me and mentioned, “See that publish over there? Individuals can pray to it if they need.” In different phrases, dwell and let dwell.
Tim Walz has his personal well-known phrase, “Thoughts your personal rattling enterprise.” Religions and perception methods are protected by our Structure; that’s what makes our democracy nice.
Anastacio Vigil, Santa Monica
..
To the editor: I’m what you’d name a non-religious Jew. Or, in different parlance, “non secular however not non secular.” Additionally, I would like to claim that I’ve no issues with anybody’s beliefs, however might and sometimes do have with a few of their actions and behaviors.
That being mentioned, on and off over a number of a long time, I used to be approached many instances by evangelicals professing their beliefs with missionary zeal, accompanied by annoying main questions on my beliefs so they might begin a persuasive debate — emphasis on “persuasive.” I’d reply that I wasn’t , then want them nicely, letting them know I didn’t need to proceed the dialog. My grievance is that nonetheless, they’d persist, typically to the purpose of aggressive pushiness accompanied by threats of divine judgment.
Once more, neutrally expressing one’s beliefs is assured free speech. However pushy persistence, also called “shoving your beliefs down my throat” with out my consent after being requested to be left alone, is what I name badgering, and even worse, harassment. And harassment shouldn’t be a assured constitutional proper.
Alan Rosenstein, Santa Monica
