BAGUIO, Philippines – Nationwide Artist for Movie Kidlat Tahimik’s favourite story of Jose Rizal was when the Spanish authorities allowed the exhibition of about 40 ethnic Filipinos together with Igorots within the Exposición de las Islas Filipinas within the Palacio Cristal in 1887.
In his letter to penpal Ferdinand Blumentritt, Rizal wrote concerning the racial mockery of Spanish newspapers of the Igorots sporting nothing however G-strings till certainly one of them died of pneumonia.
Allow them to die, Rizal wrote in frustration till he settled down and stated that at the least the Igorots stay in concord with nature, not just like the Spaniards who needed to create a human zoo.
Kidlat, ever playful, stated of Rizal: “Beneath his winter coat he wore his bahag.” He had since collected woodcarvings of Rizal (and Bonifacio) sporting a bahag, which he had gifted to some mates.
Kidlat exacted revenge for Rizal in 2021 when he arrange his Magellan, Marilyn, Mickey & Fr. Dámaso. 500 Years of Conquistador RockStars, at Palacio de Cristal. He stuffed up the huge house with assemblages of bululs and different Filipino indigenous figures, Spanish conquistadors, and American pop icons like Mickey Mouse and Marilyn Monroe to create his personal postcolonial human zoo.
A few of these assemblages had been proven on the Nationwide Museum and a few donated “The Trojan Horse” and “The Galleon” on the Mactan-Cebu Worldwide Airport (MCIA) Terminals 1 and a couple of to finish a bizarre circumnavigation of types.
His Rizal assemblages, nonetheless, had been proven throughout Rizal’s birthday in June on the Baguio Museum.
“Glad Orbit, Pepe,” Kidlat in G-string shouted to the viewers.
‘Kathang Ipis’
Kidlat Tahimik’s exhibit was certainly one of two in Baguio that celebrated Rizal this yr. The opposite one was Dengcoy Miel’s homecoming exhibit final August on the Bencab Museum entitled “Kathang Ipis.”
Dengcoy, a long-time government artist of The Strait Instances in Singapore, retired and got here residence this yr.
Like Kidlat, Dengcoy Miel treats Rizal as much less a historic topic than a conceptual hinge. The hero turns into a vessel via which questions of energy, religion and post-colonial id can go. His earlier Rizal portraits like “Rizal within the Land of Lilimut” distill what Miel calls the filibuster spirit of the revolution — defiance sharpened by mind, resistance fueled not solely by arms however by concepts. That is Rizal not as saint, however as provocation, a reminder that dissent is an ethical stance as a lot as a political one.
In “Kathang Ipis”, he paired Rizal with Bonifacio, and as political taxonomies go, the Nationwide Hero was once more portrayed as a pacifist. This was evident in his “Allergic to Violence” and “The Pacifist’s Nightmare” the place the bolo turns into actually too sizzling to deal with.
His obra maestra within the exhibit, “Walang Katapusang Cuento ng Pighati at Pagdurusa (Revolt-In)” has Rizal and Bonifacio locking arms, whereas their different fingers held a smoldering bolo (for Andres) and a flaming quill (for Jose). Rizal’s measured religion in purpose, reform, and the gradual labor of phrases appears current within the work’s reflective pauses whereas Bonifacio’s uncooked insistence on rupture and motion surges via its extra violent, unrelenting imagery. The piece refuses to resolve their debate. As an alternative, it means that Philippine grief is born exactly from this pressure: the nation’s behavior of pondering its means out of ache whereas concurrently bleeding via it.
For Miel, the sorrow continues because the nation is condemned to hold each Rizal’s lucid sorrow and Bonifacio’s livid anguish on the similar locked arms.
Kidlat, then again, has Rizal because the supreme “indio-genius,” which is each reclamation and provocation. “Indio,” a colonial slur, is stripped of its insult and fused with mind, creativeness, and resistance. Kidlat at all times says that it was his late Ifugao pal Lopez Nauyac who taught him that phrase. Utilized to Rizal, the phrase destabilizes the hero’s ordinary pedestal. Rizal is not merely the product of European enlightenment; he turns into a bridge determine, fluent in Western types but anchored in native consciousness. Subsequently, with a bahag.
He imagined Rizal holding a pen in a single hand, like Miel, and a digicam within the different. The pairing feels autobiographical, in fact.
What distinguishes each Kidlat and Dengcoy are their refusal of piety. Kidlat’s Rizal protests human zoos, mocks friars, and lingers uncomfortably within the current, the place reminiscence is crowded out by noise and novelty. By framing Rizal as inspiration quite than icon, Kidlat argues for a residing relationship with historical past.
Miel performs the dyslexic. He stated that Kathang Ipis was, in fact, a play of isip and he performed with it.
“Why Kathang Ipis? In all probability as a result of our factors of view are that of the underling, of women and men nonetheless being haunted by the darkish shadows of our previous. It’s these puns supposed that reveals our playful and merry acceptance and shielded defiance to the challenges of the previous, current and the longer term,” he stated in the course of the opening.
“The work on this present hope to crystallize our collective traumas, make peace with them and hopefully be taught from them, too.”
In revisiting Rizal, Miel, the balikbayan, was additionally revisiting himself, asking the query that underlies a lot of his artwork: not solely what Rizal means to Filipinos immediately, however whether or not, in an age of distraction and self-inflicted myths, they nonetheless deserve him. – Rappler.com
