U.S. President Donald Trump (R) meets with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney within the Oval Workplace of the White Home on October 07, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Anna Moneymaker | Getty Photos
The Home on Wednesday handed a decision disapproving of President Donald Trump’s tariffs towards Canada, a blow to Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and a uncommon Republican rebuke of the president’s signature financial coverage.
The decision cleared the Home 219-211, with a number of Republicans crossing the aisle to assist it. One Democrat, Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, voted towards the measure.
The tariff decision, launched by Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., was thought of a day after a procedural vote on a rule that may have barred Home challenges to Trump’s tariffs failed with the assist of three Republican members.
Trump warned Republicans through the vote that there can be penalties for overriding him on tariffs.
“Any Republican, within the Home or the Senate, that votes towards TARIFFS will critically undergo the results come Election time, and that features Primaries!” Trump posted to his TRUTH social account through the vote. “TARIFFS have given us Financial and Nationwide Safety, and no Republican ought to be liable for destroying this privilege.”
The chance was value it for some Republicans, particularly these in swing districts the place tariffs are deeply unpopular.
Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., who’s retiring on the finish of his time period and voted for the anti-tariff decision, informed reporters earlier within the day that the White Home tried and didn’t flip his vote.
“I voted on precept,” Bacon mentioned of a Tuesday procedural vote that allowed the measure to proceed. “They had been attempting to do sweeteners for Nebraska, however I mentioned what concerning the different 49 states?”
The Democratic aspect of the Home chamber erupted in cheers when the decision handed.
“The Speaker continues to abdicate his obligations, ceding Congress’s Article I authority to Donald Trump,” Meeks, the highest Democrat on the Home International Affairs Committee, mentioned in a assertion posted to X on Tuesday. “Republicans now face a transparent alternative: go on the report and be part of Democrats in ending these cost-raising tariffs, or preserve forcing American households to pay for them.”
The measure now heads to the Senate, which authorised related resolutions final yr.
“Congress has spoken with bipartisan readability: it is time to give Individuals reduction and finish Trump’s tariff tax,” mentioned Senate Minority Chief Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. “This price-spiking tariff tax is elevating prices on every thing from groceries costs to vitality payments — all as a result of Trump selected chaos over frequent sense. It is time to ship reduction.”
The vote on Trump’s tariffs pressured Home Republicans to decide on between loyalty to the president and putting down financial coverage that many within the GOP convention don’t like.
Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., Kevin Kiley, R-Calif., and Don Bacon, R-Neb., bucked Trump and GOP leaders on Tuesday by voting with each Democrat to defeat a rule that may have blocked Home votes on Trump’s tariffs by means of July 31.
“I do not like placing the necessary work of the Home on pause, however Congress wants to have the ability to debate on tariffs. Tariffs have been a ‘web unfavourable’ for the economic system and are a major tax that American customers, producers, and farmers are paying,” Bacon posted to X after the Tuesday vote.
Due to the razor-thin GOP majority within the Home, Johnson can afford to lose just one Republican vote if all Democrats are current and vote in favor of the decision to finish Trump’s Canada tariff.
Nonetheless, the trouble is probably going symbolic. Even when the Senate approves Meeks’ decision, Trump would probably veto the laws.
“That is life with a razor-thin majority,” Johnson mentioned in a Wednesday morning look on Fox Enterprise. “I feel it is a massive mistake. I do not assume we have to go down the highway of attempting to restrict the president’s energy whereas he’s within the midst of negotiating America-first commerce agreements with nations world wide.”
