NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
Home Judiciary Committee Democrats have introduced they’re probing the FBI over whether or not Director Kash Patel is willfully refusing to reveal data associated to Jeffrey Epstein.
“Who precisely are you defending by refusing to launch the Epstein recordsdata? In 2023, on Benny Johnson’s podcast, you had been requested why the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was ‘defending the world’s foremost predator’ by refusing to launch the Epstein consumer listing. Your reply: ‘Easy. Due to who’s on that listing,'” Democratic lawmakers, led by rating member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., wrote.
“Now that you’re the Director of the FBI, you already know exactly who’s implicated within the Epstein recordsdata, but you refuse to launch them. Who’re you defending and why?”
HOUSE MOVES TO EXPOSE EPSTEIN FILES, AUTHORIZES OVERSIGHT PROBE
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell had been each indicted on federal intercourse trafficking prices stemming from Epstein’s years of abuse of underage ladies. (Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan through Getty Photos)
The letter pointed to a number of events the place Patel known as for transparency in Epstein’s case, together with his assertion quickly after taking the function, “There shall be no cover-ups, no lacking paperwork, and no stone left unturned — and anybody from the prior or present Bureau who undermines this shall be swiftly pursued.”
“Surprisingly, all these guarantees seem to have collapsed when you decided who was truly within the recordsdata,” the Democrats wrote.
In addition they referenced a New York Instances report that detailed lots of of individuals pouring over 1000’s of paperwork associated to Epstein.
“This frantic evaluation by practically 1,000 brokers of over 100,000 pages of investigative materials apparently revealed no data worthy of disclosure to the American public— nonetheless, not less than some data from the evaluation was shared with President Trump. In Might, Lawyer Basic Bondi reportedly knowledgeable President Trump that his title certainly appeared repeatedly within the Epstein recordsdata,” the letter stated.
“Apparent questions abound: why had been so many brokers tasked with reviewing paperwork that had been by no means launched? What particular directions had been they given through the evaluation? What data did these brokers uncover that led DOJ and FBI to reverse their promise to launch the recordsdata, and the way are these selections associated to the President?”
Kash Patel, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), arrives for a Home Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Associated Companies listening to in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, Might 7, 2025. (Pete Kiehart/Bloomberg through Getty Photos)
President Donald Trump himself denied being informed that his title was in any recordsdata associated to Epstein in late July.
“No, I used to be by no means, by no means briefed. No,” the president stated on the time.
It was by no means reported in what context Trump’s title might have appeared, nonetheless. It is recognized that the 2 had been pleasant earlier than a falling out within the early 2000s, although Trump has by no means been implicated in any wrongdoing associated to Epstein’s crimes.
LONGTIME BIDEN AIDE SAYS HE STOOD TO EARN UP TO $8M HAD PRESIDENT WON RE-ELECTION
Trump himself directed the Division of Justice (DOJ) to launch grand jury transcripts associated to Epstein, and Lawyer Basic Pam Bondi subsequently had her deputy interview Epstein confederate Ghislaine Maxwell in a Florida jail.
Trump has additionally known as the furor surrounding Epstein a “hoax” on a number of events.
The DOJ has since turned over 1000’s of paperwork associated to Epstein to the Home Oversight Committee.
Convicted intercourse offender Epstein dedicated suicide in 2019 whereas awaiting prosecution on federal intercourse trafficking prices and the GOP base has fractured over the administration’s dealing with of the case.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The divisions stem from a DOJ memo launched in July that stated, “This systematic evaluation revealed no incriminating ‘consumer listing.’ There was additionally no credible proof discovered that Epstein blackmailed distinguished people as a part of his actions. We didn’t uncover proof that would predicate an investigation in opposition to uncharged third events.”
Democrats have since seized on the discord with newfound requires transparency in Epstein’s case, which Republicans have panned as hypocrisy.
An FBI public data officer declined to touch upon the letter when the bureau was reached by Fox Information Digital.
