When President Donald Trump instructed reporters on Sept. 5 he’d began sending the Nationwide Guard to Portland, Oregon, he stated it was due to one thing he noticed on tv.
He stated the town was being destroyed by paid agitators. “What they’ve carried out to that place, it’s like residing in hell,” he stated, a remark that turned an web meme as some Portland residents juxtaposed it with tranquil photographs of the town.
Trump didn’t say which channel he watched; he stated at one level he noticed one thing “right this moment” and at one other “final night time.”
The night earlier than, on Sept. 4, Fox Information aired a two-and-a-half-minute section spotlighting protests outdoors a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement discipline workplace in Portland. Related footage aired the morning of Trump’s remarks. The president went on to announce Sept. 27 on Fact Social that he would ship troops, saying that he was “authorizing Full Drive, if essential.”
He later stated he’d instructed Oregon’s governor, Tina Kotek, that “until they’re enjoying false tapes, this regarded like World Conflict II. Your house is burning down.”
ProPublica examined months of Fox Information’ protection and reviewed greater than 700 video clips posted to social media by protesters, counterprotesters and others within the three months previous the Sept. 4 broadcast.
The overview discovered that the information community repeatedly offered a deceptive image of what was occurring in Portland.
As The Guardian and The Oregonian/OregonLive have reported, Fox Information on Sept. 4 used footage from the 2020 protests after the police killing of George Floyd and stated it was from 2025. We discovered two clear instances from that night time in addition to one which appeared to match a scene filmed at a key web site of the 2020 protests. Fox additionally mislabeled two different dates of actions proven on display screen, and one broadcast implied {that a} protest from elsewhere was occurring in Portland.
Fox Information chyrons about Portland the week of Trump’s remarks carried phrases like “violent demonstrators,” “protesters riot,” “anti-I.C.E. Portland rioters” and “war-like protests.” One host stated protesters had been attacking federal officers.
This portrayal of protesters as routinely instigating violence or rioting was additionally deceptive.
As ProPublica reported final week, most clashes between protesters and police earlier than the Fox Information section didn’t lead to any felony expenses or arrests alleging protesters dedicated violence. What’s extra, based mostly on information releases from federal and native authorities, expenses and arrests for assault, arson or destruction of property had been nearly totally confined to a interval that ended the night time of July 4.
Movies after that date captured quite a few photographs of federal officers forcefully shifting in on protesters with out corresponding felony expenses alleging protester violence.
A spokesperson for Fox Information didn’t reply to ProPublica’s requests for remark.
The Division of Homeland Safety didn’t reply requests to touch upon its officers’ ways.
White Home spokesperson Abigail Jackson stated of motion on the bottom in Portland: “This isn’t a peaceable protest that’s below management, like many on the left have claimed, it’s radical violence. President Trump is taking lawful motion to guard federal legislation enforcement officers and handle the out-of-control violence that native residents have complained about and Democrat leaders have didn’t cease.”
Right here’s how Fox Information’ protection of the Portland story was deceptive.
Fox Information Mentioned It Was 2025. It Wasn’t.
Protests in 2020 within the wake of Floyd’s homicide by a police officer attracted massive, generally violent crowds to Portland — together with a federal legislation enforcement response approved by Trump.
The protests outdoors the ICE facility have sometimes been far smaller. Nonetheless, Fox spliced footage from 2020 into its protection this yr and claimed it was from 2025.
The Fox Information correspondent within the section that aired the night time Trump was watching TV stated: “On this night time in late June, police used tear fuel.”
The accompanying picture seems to be not from the ICE constructing however from the federal courthouse in downtown Portland, greater than a mile away. A virtually similar scene was proven in a Fox Information video 5 years earlier. Footage that aired Sept. 4, shot at a barely totally different angle, blurs out spots the place graffiti was seen on the constructing in Fox’s July 2020 broadcast.
Virtually instantly after displaying the courthouse scene, the section cuts to a different picture because the correspondent says, “federal police used tear fuel and flashbangs.”
On display screen at that second is a U.S. Navy veteran who was pepper-sprayed and repeatedly struck with a baton. However it didn’t occur in September 2025. The video was posted on social media on July 18, 2020.
The Fox Information section concerning the ICE protests quickly reveals an American flag burning.
That picture was posted on social media July 16, 2020.
The situation: the bottom of a downtown Portland statue greater than a mile away from the ICE constructing the place protests are occurring in 2025.
On the webpage for its Sept. 4 video section, Fox Information added an editor’s be aware not less than two weeks later: “This video comprises footage from protests in Portland in 2020 and 2025.”
“Nonetheless Going On”
After mislabeling 2020 occasions as 2025, Fox’s Sept. 4 night broadcast explicitly drew a connection between the 2 durations.
“The protest chaos, which started with riots geared toward social justice in 2020, has severely broken Portland’s fame,” the correspondent stated.
The dramatic footage at this second reveals fires on the street and was broadcast on Fox on Aug. 19, 2020, the day after a crowd smashed by way of home windows and set gadgets on fireplace within the headquarters for the federal government of Multnomah County, the place Portland is positioned.
We don’t know for sure which broadcast obtained Trump occupied with Portland. The White Home didn’t reply to questions on what Trump watched. However the president stated on Sept. 5 that what he’d seen about Portland on TV was “unbelievable.”
“I didn’t know that was nonetheless occurring,” he stated. “This has been occurring for years.”
The fact: Portland’s 2020 social justice protests, which resulted in a whole lot of arrests and continued for months, turned sporadic by early 2021. Protests in years since have led to occasional property injury, however nothing in Portland has matched the size of occasions that adopted Floyd’s dying.
Portland police Chief Bob Day stated at a Sept. 29 press convention that the town had been inaccurately portrayed by way of the lens of the protests in 2020 and 2021.
“What’s really occurring, and the response we’re seeing each from Portlanders and from the Portland Police Bureau,” Day stated, “will not be consistent with that nationwide narrative. And it’s irritating.”
A Riot That Wasn’t
In a Sept. 2 section that includes the video from a day earlier, anchor Invoice Hemmer stated it reveals “riots raging.” Anchor Hint Gallagher teased one other Sept. 2 information section by as soon as once more displaying the video, saying, “It’s a riot outdoors a Portland ICE facility.”
The Sept. 4 section reveals Julie Parrish, an lawyer for a neighbor of the ICE facility, accusing Portland police of claiming, “Meh, we’re simply gonna let violent rioters do that for 80 straight nights.”
The bodily conduct of protesters that was captured on the video will not be violent. The digital camera as an alternative reveals federal brokers advancing on them. Within the moments earlier than officers tossed munitions into the gang, movies present, one protester was blowing bubbles. The Portland police didn’t declare a riot, a authorized designation that permits for an elevated police use of pressure. (They declared a riot simply as soon as, a police spokesperson stated, on June 14.)
The Sept. 1 protest had “little to no vitality,” in accordance with an inside Portland police abstract, earlier than federal officers dispersed the gang to gather a prop guillotine that had been introduced. Katie Daviscourt, a Trump-aligned commentator who filmed the clips, famous on X that protesters had been having dance events and that their important issues had been “not leaving restricted areas, burning a flag, and possessing a lethal object (guillotine).”
ProPublica discovered an analogous sample for the three months earlier than Fox’s Sept. 4 broadcast: clashes that on most days and nights had no felony allegations of protester violence to clarify them.
After dozens of arrests and expenses had been introduced in June by way of July 4, federal prosecutors accused simply three individuals of crimes on the ICE constructing within the roughly two months main as much as Fox’s Sept. 4 broadcast.
Throughout that very same two-month time-frame, ProPublica’s overview discovered quite a few situations of police utilizing pressure: movies from greater than 20 days or nights with federal officers grabbing, shoving, pepper-spraying, tackling, firing on or utilizing different munitions on protesters.
No native arrests or federal felony expenses had been introduced on lately or nights, and solely a handful of dates corresponded with incidents of protester aggression later asserted by federal authorities of their authorized case for sending troops.
Requested whether or not Fox Information precisely represented her footage, Daviscourt stated: “I stand by my 4 months of correct reporting.”
Parrish instructed ProPublica she had collected proof that “reveals ongoing and protracted exercise” outdoors the power that below statute and police directive “can be thought-about riotous, illegal meeting and/or disorderly conduct.” She declined to share this proof, saying it was privileged as a part of her shopper’s file.
Her lawsuit on behalf of a neighbor residing close to the ICE facility, which sought to require police to implement Portland’s noise ordinance, was dismissed.
The Reappearing Neighbor
A Sept. 5 “Fox & Mates” section confirmed a neighbor from an condominium constructing confronting protesters over noise, shouting at protesters: “Flip that (bleep) down, it’s midnight! … We the individuals want sleep!”
Fox stated it occurred Tuesday, which might have been Sept. 2. Co-host Ainsley Earhardt stated, “This has been occurring for months now, however numerous this since Labor Day,” because the video proven on display screen sandwiches footage of the neighbor between different scenes from the Labor Day protest.
“This can be a chaotic metropolis,” co-host Brian Kilmeade stated.
The subsequent day, the clip of the neighbor appeared once more on Fox Information. This time, the community stated the footage was from Wednesday, or Sept. 3.
In actuality, the confrontation was captured on video months earlier than. Daviscourt printed the video on June 29 on X.
On the 2 September nights that Fox stated the neighbor’s confrontation occurred, ProPublica’s overview discovered no movies of violent clashes posted on social media, and federal authorities introduced no arrests.
For instance, in accordance with a Portland police electronic mail from 11:22 p.m. on Sept. 3: “There are nonetheless about 20 individuals hanging round however solely 4 had been even on the sidewalk in entrance of the constructing.”
Misrepresentations Proceed After Trump’s Guard Order
On Sept. 28, the day Trump’s order was applied, a Fox Information broadcast performed a clip of Kotek saying that Guard troops weren’t wanted in Portland, then instantly lower to a clip of a busy scene of protesters clashing with police.
“Want she might see a few of these photographs,” the anchor stated. Sarcastically, as a co-anchor chuckled, she added: “Take a look at that. Only a peaceable protest.”
A small field on the display screen confirmed the footage wasn’t from Oregon.
It was from Illinois.
