On left, NPR President and CEO Katherine Maher testifies throughout a Home Oversight and Authorities Reform Committee listening to on the U.S. Capitol on March 26. On proper, CPB President and CEO Patricia Harrison accepts the Governors Award on CPB’s behalf through the 2025 Inventive Arts Emmy Awards on Sept. 7.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Photos and Phil McCarten/Invision/AP
conceal caption
toggle caption
Andrew Harnik/Getty Photos and Phil McCarten/Invision/AP
The Company for Public Broadcasting agreed Monday to satisfy a $36 million, multi-year contract with NPR that it had yanked after strain from the Trump White Home.
The association resolves litigation filed by NPR accusing the company of illegally yielding to Trump’s calls for that the community be financially punished for its information protection. The argument, a part of a broader lawsuit by NPR and a number of other stations in opposition to the Trump administration, centered on CPB funding for NPR’s operation of a satellite tv for pc distribution system for native public radio stations. NPR introduced Monday it will waive all charges for the stations related to the satellite tv for pc service.
The decide within the case had explicitly advised CPB’s authorized staff he didn’t discover its protection credible. CPB attorneys had argued that the choice to award the contract to a brand new consortium of public media establishments was pushed by a want to foster digital improvements extra swiftly.
“The settlement is a victory for editorial independence and a step towards upholding the First Modification rights of NPR and the general public media system in our authorized problem to [Trump’s] Government Order,” Katherine Maher, President and CEO of NPR, mentioned in an announcement. “Whereas we entered into this dispute with CPB reluctantly, we’re glad to resolve it in a method that allows us to proceed to offer for the soundness of the Public Radio Satellite tv for pc System, provide rapid and direct assist to public radio stations throughout the nation, and proceed with our robust and substantive claims in opposition to this unlawful and unconstitutional Government Order. We look ahead to our day in courtroom in December.”
In its submission Monday night to the courtroom, CPB didn’t concede that it had acted wrongfully — nor that it had yielded to political strain from the administration.
As an alternative, in an announcement posted on its web site, CPB asserted its aspect “prevails” on account of the settlement.
“This is a vital second for public media,” mentioned Patricia Harrison, President and CEO of CPB. “We’re very happy that this pricey and pointless litigation is over, and that our funding sooner or later via [Public Media Infrastructure] marks an thrilling new period for public media.” CPB had awarded a rival contract to PMI, a newly created consortium of public radio organizations together with a number of main stations, to make sure the digital distribution system capabilities correctly. That contract will proceed, CPB mentioned.
Federal subsidies for public broadcasting stopped on Oct. 1 on account of a party-line vote over the summer time by Congress, referred to as a rescission. Solely a skeleton crew stays at CPB, which was created as a nonprofit company greater than a half-century in the past to funnel federal subsidies to public media. Whereas PBS has had layoffs and NPR is monitoring its personal funds, many native stations throughout the nation have been hit onerous.
Over the course of the litigation this fall, mounting proof appeared to reveal that CPB’s board chair and executives had acted in opposition to NPR in what turned out to be a futile try to salvage the company’s personal future.

In hearings final month in Washington, D.C., U.S. District Courtroom Decide Randolph Moss advised CPB’s authorized staff that they had not made a reputable case for why the company reneged on the contract only a day after a high White Home official warned senior CPB leaders in opposition to doing enterprise with NPR. A trial had been set to start out on Dec. 1.
CPB’s change of thoughts — and NPR’s ensuing lawsuit — sparked consternation and unease inside the bigger public media ecosystem. The 2 organizations had served as companions for many years. However that relationship frayed earlier this yr, because the system got here below assault from the Trump administration.

Trump’s public marketing campaign in opposition to NPR and PBS began in earnest quickly after he returned to the White Home. Trump kicked it into excessive gear in late March with a sequence of social media posts.
In early April, CPB leaders sought to get cash out the door earlier than Trump took motion in opposition to public media. On April 2, CPB’s board authorised the extension of a contract with NPR to distribute public radio packages, together with these not produced by NPR. The association stretched again 4 many years. The quantity included hundreds of thousands nonetheless due on the then-current contract.

The subsequent day, CPB’s board chair and two senior executives met with a high White Home funds official who attested to her “intense dislike for NPR.” The funds official advised them CPB did not need to “throw the newborn out with the bathwater,” based on a deposition from CPB govt Clayton Barsoum submitted as a part of NPR’s authorized filings.
And the day after that — simply 48 hours after that board vote — CPB reversed itself. CPB govt Kathy Merritt knowledgeable NPR’s high official over the satellite tv for pc and distribution service that it needed to be spun off: it couldn’t be a part of NPR. NPR refused to take action. CPB revised the scope of the contract and solicited new bids. NPR’s submission proved unsuccessful.
In the meantime, the White Home was ramping up the strain. It accused NPR and PBS of bias. On April 14, for instance, it issued a proper assertion that referred to as their choices “radical, woke propaganda disguised as ‘information’.” NPR and PBS’s chief executives have rejected the accusations of bias.
On Might 1, Trump issued an govt order that no federal cash ought to go to the 2 public broadcasting networks. NPR and three Colorado public radio stations then filed go well with in opposition to the White Home, saying they have been being unlawfully punished as a result of the president didn’t like their information protection. They contended the manager order represented a violation of First Modification protections. Their go well with names CPB as a defendant as properly for, of their characterization, bending to the president’s will. In Monday’s authorized submitting, CPB agreed that the manager order was exactly the type of authorities interference that Congress sought to forestall in establishing CPB because it did.
In the summertime, Republican leaders within the U.S. Congress, urged on by Trump, pulled again all $1.1 billion for future public broadcasting that had already been authorised and signed into regulation by the president.
All through the authorized battle, NPR has mentioned, whatever the final result of the case, it will work with Public Media Infrastructure.
NPR’s broader constitutional case in opposition to Trump’s govt order purporting to ban federal funding of public media continues. A listening to on its deserves is scheduled for December.
Disclosure: This story was reported and written by NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik. It was edited by Deputy Enterprise Editor Emily Kopp and Managing Editors Gerry Holmes and Vickie Walton-James. Beneath NPR’s protocol for reporting on itself, no NPR company official or information govt reviewed this story earlier than it was posted publicly.

