That escalated shortly. We’re barely into 2026, and occasions are already unfolding that would meaningfully reshape the political panorama.
The loss of life of Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mom and U.S. citizen who was shot and killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent in Minneapolis on Wednesday, has the potential to shake the political panorama in methods harking back to George Floyd’s killing in 2020.
The Trump administration initially claimed Good “weaponized her automobile” in an act of “home terrorism,” an account that seems to be contradicted by video proof. Whether or not the incident escalates right into a broader political reckoning — or fades from public consideration — could decide its lasting impact on President Trump’s recognition and his immigration insurance policies.
In the meantime, Trump’s choice to invade Venezuela and seize then-President Nicolás Maduro stays controversial, even amongst a few of his followers.
The assault drew instant criticism from Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tucker Carlson and Laura Loomer, with Carlson and Loomer going as far as to drift the declare that Maduro’s ouster was actually about imposing homosexual marriage on Venezuela (that is spectacular, as a result of it manages to mix international coverage, tradition warfare panic and full nonsense right into a single sentence).
However this schism isn’t restricted to ex-Home members, podcasters and conspiracy theorists. Contained in the administration, the steadiness of energy seems to be tilting away from the noninterventionists and towards the hawks — not less than, for now.
The present beneficiary of this shift is Secretary of State Marco Rubio. As not too long ago as final month, JD Vance, who has usually staked out an anti-interventionist posture, appeared like Trump’s apparent inheritor. Now, Rubio’s inventory is up (if “Lil Marco” falls brief, he can at all times accept Viceroy of Venezuela).
That’s to not say Rubio is wherever close to being Trump’s clear successor. Venezuela may disappear from the headlines as shortly because it arrived, buried beneath the following disaster, scandal or social media outburst. Or it may go sideways and dominate headlines for years or many years.
Navy adventurism has an uncanny behavior of doing precisely that.
If Venezuela turns right into a slow-motion catastrophe, Democrats will reap the advantages as will the GOP’s “America First” contingent.
However January hasn’t simply offered a potential touchstone for Republicans; Democrats have been hit with their very own problem, too: the Minnesota fraud scandal, which has already pushed Democratic Gov. Tim Walz out of a reelection bid. It’s the sort of story that reinforces voters’ worst suspicions about their get together.
Throughout the previous 5 years, elements of Minnesota’s Somali diaspora grew to become entangled in alleged fraudulent exercise, reportedly submitting hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in claims for social providers that weren’t truly rendered.
The main points are difficult; the implications should not. Public applications retain help solely when voters imagine they’re competently managed, and this story suggests the alternative.
The truth that the scandal includes the Somali neighborhood makes it much more flamable. Honest or not, it offers ready-made ammunition for these desirous to stoke racial resentment, discredit refugee insurance policies and switch bureaucratic failure into an indictment on Democrats.
The fallout extends nicely past Minnesota. Kamala Harris has been signaling curiosity in one other presidential run, and Walz was her vice-presidential decide in what was already a truncated and awkward marketing campaign. That call alone gained’t sink a future bid for her, but it surely actually doesn’t strengthen her already doubtful case that she has distinctive political judgment.
Extra troubling for Democrats is the worry that Minnesota is the tip of the iceberg. Walz’s exodus was sparked by a right-wing YouTuber who began performing some sleuthing — and introduced consideration to years-old investigations by the Walz and Biden administrations. Different influencers are already promising comparable exposés elsewhere.
Proper-wing podcaster Benny Johnson, for instance, has introduced plans to descend on California, declaring it “the fraud capital of the world.” Newsom returned fireplace with a vicious Trump-like retort, demonstrating as soon as once more why he grew to become the Democratic frontrunner in 2025.
Newsom’s Twitter rejoinder apart, it’s not loopy to suppose that the Democrats’ latest momentum could possibly be squandered if it seems extra of those scandals exist and have been ignored, downplayed or (worse) coated up.
It’s dangerous to explain something in trendy politics as a turning level, as a result of every week reliably produces one thing that eclipses the final outrage. Nonetheless, the opening days of this new 12 months already really feel consequential. Seeds have been planted. Whether or not they mature is the query.
Buckle up. It’s solely January.
Matt Ok. Lewis is the creator of “Filthy Wealthy Politicians” and “Too Dumb to Fail.”
