This courtroom sketch depicts former FBI Director James Comey, second from left, and his attorneys Jessica Carmichael, seated left, and Patrick J. Fitzgerald, standing proper, throughout his arraignment on the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2025. Assistant U.S. Legal professional Tyler Lemons, is seated proper.
Dana Verkouteren/AP
cover caption
toggle caption
Dana Verkouteren/AP
ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A federal choose on Wednesday ordered prosecutors within the legal case of former FBI Director James Comey to supply to protection legal professionals a trove of supplies from the investigation, saying he was involved the Justice Division’s place had been to “indict first” and examine second.

U.S. Justice of the Peace Choose William Fitzpatrick instructed prosecutors to supply by the tip of the day on Thursday grand jury supplies and different proof that investigators seized in the course of the investigation. The order adopted arguments through which Comey’s attorneys stated they have been at an obstacle as a result of that they had not been capable of but assessment info that was collected years in the past as a part of an investigation into FBI media leaks.
Comey, who attended the listening to however didn’t communicate, is charged with mendacity to Congress in 2020 in a case filed days after President Donald Trump appeared to induce his legal professional basic to prosecute the previous FBI director and different perceived political enemies. Comey has pleaded not responsible, and his legal professionals have argued that it is a vindictive prosecution introduced on the course of the Republican president and should be dismissed.
Fitzpatrick raised his personal issues, telling legal professionals on Wednesday, “The procedural posture of this case is extremely uncommon.” He stated it appeared to him that the Justice Division had determined to “indict first” and examine later.
Comey’s protection legal professionals had already requested for a transcript of grand jury proceedings, citing irregularities within the course of and potential authorized and factual errors that they stated might consequence within the dismissal of the case.

Fitzpatrick on Wednesday ordered prosecutors to supply grand jury supplies and in addition directed them to present protection legal professionals proof seized via search warrants in 2019 and 2020 from Daniel Richman, a Columbia College legislation professor and shut buddy of Comey.
Richman elements into the case as a result of prosecutors say Comey had inspired him to interact with reporters about issues associated to the FBI and say Comey subsequently lied to the Senate Judiciary Committee 5 years in the past when he denied having licensed media leaks. Comey’s legal professionals deny that he made a false assertion and say the query he responded to, from Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, was imprecise and complicated and seemed to be centered not on Richman however moderately a unique particular person, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
Comey’s legal professionals instructed the choose that they had not been proven by the federal government the supplies taken from Richman, who had earlier served as a lawyer for Comey, and thus couldn’t know what info was privileged and should have been improperly used as proof.
“We will repair that, and we will repair that right now,” the choose stated.
Comey’s indictment got here days after Trump in a social media publish referred to as on Legal professional Normal Pam Bondi to take motion in opposition to Comey and different longtime foes of the president. The indictment was introduced by Lindsey Halligan, a former White Home aide and Trump lawyer who was put in as U.S. legal professional after the longtime prosecutor who had been overseeing the investigation resigned below administration strain to indict Comey and New York Legal professional Normal Letitia James.

The Justice Division in courtroom papers earlier this week defended the president’s social media publish, contending it displays “reputable prosecutorial motive” and isn’t any foundation to dismiss the indictment.

