To the editor: I typically reread items within the Opinion part to make certain I’ve understood all of the nuances or to grapple with a specific perspective on a difficulty, together with my very own. Till at the moment, I don’t assume I’ve ever learn a information merchandise twice. The truth is, I used to be in such disbelief that I needed to learn it thrice (“Bear bother in Sierra Madre: After the Eaton hearth, dwelling invasions rise sharply,” Aug. 1).
Authorities shot and killed a bear that had been tranquilized? The bear was not a menace to anybody whereas tranquilized. But, as a substitute of trucking her farther into the wilds and releasing her, they discovered it essential to kill her? To shoot a contained animal is an act of cruelty. If there have been a authentic motive to euthanize the bear, there are humane methods to place an animal down painlessly.
It goes with out saying that nobody desires a bear breaking into their dwelling, however this ill-advised try at an answer is an pointless act of barbarism, a 2025 model of the ending of the 1957 movie “Previous Yeller.” Besides that capturing that canine was an act of affection. Capturing this bear was an act of brutality.
Teresa DeCrescenzo, Studio Metropolis
