For the previous three days, Los Angeles–based mostly artist Brittany Fanning has posted the identical image to her Instagram grid. It reveals two grinning males in double-breasted fits, full with pocket squares. In her caption, she identifies them as brothers Jackson Navin and Matthew Navin, of London-based gallery Pictorum Artwork Group. In a separate posting, Fanning says that she continues to be owed cash from the gallery associated to a gaggle present she participated in three years in the past.
Throughout the course of her marketing campaign, Fanning stated she realized that different artists are claiming to be in the same scenario and have additionally not obtained fee from Pictorum. One in all these artists, Finn Johnson, obtained a court docket judgment ordering fee for balances owed to her. Moreover, former staffers informed ARTnews that they’ve additionally gone unpaid regardless of quite a few makes an attempt to contact the principals.
Pictorum was dissolved in July, and ARTnews’s makes an attempt to succeed in the Navin brothers have been unsuccessful.
Although Fanning described herself in an interview with ARTnews as considerably new to the artwork world, she has had solo reveals since 2022 at well-regarded galleries around the globe, together with Miami’s Mindy Solomon, Los Angeles’s Steve Turner, and Seoul’s Galerie BHAK. She has additionally participated in group reveals in Rome, Mexico Metropolis, and Taipei since 2018. The artist has prior to now painted brightly coloured, sunny scenes of leisure settings usually intruded upon by wild animals; her most up-to-date work has reverted to a black and white palette.
Fanning first linked with Pictorum in 2022. Initially, she thought the gallery was doing nice issues, discovering new artists and internet hosting occasions to domesticate collectors, she recalled in her interview. However Fanning was stunned when she realized in regards to the gallery’s phrases for fee. Somewhat than providing the same old association by which a gallery takes works on consignment after which pays the artist their share of the proceeds (usually 50 %) as soon as a piece sells, Pictorum would as a substitute pay artists a smaller share, 20 to 30 %, upon receipt of the work, which might go into an exhibition that might be bought later. The gallery would pay the stability then after it sells. Receiving the stability for her works which have bought, or getting again works that haven’t, has confirmed inconceivable, Fanning stated.
Pictorum Artwork Group included in 2022, and included a gallery on Portman Sq. in London’s Marylebone neighborhood. The corporate was supposed, per its web site, “to create a gaggle of complementary artwork firms that seamlessly intertwine and supply a holistic eco-system that collectors, artists and companies alike can profit from.” These included an advisory arm; Uma Gallery, nonetheless “set to launch in 2018” per the web site; Articul8, “an artwork commentary platform and aggregator of knowledge throughout the artwork market,” supposedly set to launch in 2024; and Duveen + Vollard, providing logistical help to the artwork world. (The latter’s title refers to Britain’s Joseph Duveen and France’s Ambroise Vollard, two of an important artwork sellers in historical past.)
Screenshot
Fanning stated she obtained one fee in 2023, for a proportion of the sale of the portray Shark Lover; she says she continues to be owed $2,640 for that work. The gallery bought two different work to a collector in Saudi Arabia, for which she has obtained $1,000 within the combination. Fanning confirmed ARTnews the bill despatched to the collector by the gallery. She says she’s owed round $6,500 for these two. “That’s some huge cash to me,” she stated.
Fanning stated Matthew Navin’s mother-in-law, Beldish Shergill, can be an proprietor of Pictorum. A UK authorities web site used to find and replace UK-based firms identifies Shergill as Pictorum Artwork Group Restricted’s solely officer within the position of director. (That very same web site has an entry for each Matthew Navin and Jackson Navin, itemizing them each as director, with a label indicating “resigned,” for a corporation named Pictorum Advisory Restricted.)
Brittany Fanning, Shark Lover 2022.
courtesy the artist
Correspondence and authorized paperwork supplied to ARTnews by Jenny Thompson, performing on behalf of her daughter, artist Finn Johnson, mirror a court docket judgment for Johnson towards Pictorum Artwork Group within the quantity of £8,500 (about $11,240). The correspondence consists of emails from Matthew Navin, recognized as the corporate’s CEO, admitting to legal responsibility for excellent funds for 2 artworks, in addition to calls for by Thompson’s attorneys, Keoghs Nicholls Lindsell and Harris, to Anderson Brookes, the liquidators of Pictorum.
Brittany Fanning, Self Portrait (In a Gown) (2025).
courtesy the artist
“Our consumer has expressed critical considerations concerning the conduct of the corporate’s administrators, notably as they believe the administrators might have been engaged in fraudulent buying and selling and/or, on the very least, wrongful buying and selling prior concerning the corporate affairs,” the letter from Johnson’s counsel reads.
That letter signifies that the attorneys have had hassle finding Shergill to serve authorized papers. “On one event, an individual believed to be a member of the family of the Director knowledgeable the bailiff officer that that they had by no means heard of the debtor,” reads the letter, which provides that this “raised additional considerations concerning the nice religion and conduct of the Director.”
The letter additional alleges a “regarding sample of behaviour by the corporate” as “[s]everal younger artists entered into agreements with the corporate, surrendered their work or artworks, and obtained no fee. The corporate repeatedly promised future fee, which was by no means fulfilled.”
Nicole Bainov labored on a guide foundation as gross sales director for Pictorum from 2020 to 2022; her position was primarily performed remotely. She continues to be owed three months’ wage, she stated in a phone interview with ARTnews. “I’ve been an in depth buddy to Brittany [Fanning] for years, and I introduced her to the gallery,” she stated, noting that Pictorum hadn’t returned Fanning’s unsold works and had not despatched her fee in a well timed style. “The gallery was not working in an orthodox manner.”
One other former worker, talking anonymously pending a authorized motion, claimed in a dialog with ARTnews to be owed over £15,000 ($19,850).
Although Bainov is owed again pay, she stated, “an important factor, to me, has all the time been the artist. I’m a collector myself and I need to defend the artist. … Pay the artist first and every thing comes after.”
