Lastly free from the calls for of being Chief Archivist of the US, Secretary of State, Nationwide Safety Advisor and unofficial Viceroy of Venezuela, Marco Rubio made his method to the Munich Safety Convention final weekend to ship a significant handle.
I shouldn’t make enjoyable. Rubio, not like so many main figures on this administration, is a bona fide severe particular person. Certainly, that’s why President Trump retains piling obligations on him. Rubio is aware of what he’s speaking about and cares about coverage. He’s hardly a free agent; Trump remains to be president in any case. However in an administration full of individuals prepared to behave like social media trolls, Rubio stands out for being severe. And I welcome that.
However simply because Rubio made a severe argument, that doesn’t imply it was wholly persuasive. A part of his aim was to restore among the injury accomplished by his boss, who not way back threatened to explode the North Atlantic alliance by snatching Greenland away from Denmark. Rubio’s conciliatory language was welcome, nevertheless it hardly set issues proper.
Whether or not it was his intent or not, Rubio had extra success in providing a distinction with Vice President JD Vance, who used the Munich convention final yr as a platform to insult allies and supply fan service to his followers on X. Rubio’s speech was the one Vance ought to have given, if the aim was to supply a severe argument about Trump’s “imaginative and prescient” for the Western alliance. I put “imaginative and prescient” in scare quotes as a result of it’s unclear to me that Trump really has one, however the broader MAGA crowd is determined to assemble a coherent idea of their case.
So what’s that case? That Western Civilization is an actual factor, America isn’t solely a part of it but in addition its chief, and it’ll do the onerous issues required to repair it.
In Rubio’s story, America and Europe embraced insurance policies within the Nineteen Nineties that amounted to the “managed decline” of the West. European governments have been free riders on America’s navy would possibly and allowed their protection capabilities to atrophy as they funded bloated welfare states and inefficient regulatory regimes. Free commerce, mass migration and an infatuation with “the rules-based international order” eroded nationwide sovereignty, undermined the “cohesion of our societies” and fueled the “de-industrialization” of our economies. The treatment for these items? Reversing course on these insurance policies and embracing the onerous actuality that energy and energy drive occasions on the worldwide stage.
“The basic query we should reply on the outset is what precisely are we defending,” Rubio stated, “as a result of armies don’t struggle for abstractions. Armies struggle for a folks; armies struggle for a nation. Armies struggle for a lifestyle.”
I agree with a few of this — to some extent. And, truthfully, given how refreshing it’s to listen to a grown-up argument from this administration, it feels churlish to quibble.
However, for starters, the straightforward reality is that Western Civilization is an abstraction, and so are nations and peoples. And that’s nice. Abstractions — like love, patriotism, ethical rules, justice — are actually vital. Our “lifestyle” is essentially outlined and understood by means of abstractions: freedom, the American dream, democracy, and so forth. What’s the “Nice” in Make America Nice Once more, if not an abstraction?
That is vital as a result of the administration’s defenders ridicule or dismiss any principled objection critics increase as fastidious gitchy-goo eggheadery. Trump tramples the rule of regulation, pardons cronies, tries to steal an election and violates free market rules willy-nilly. And in the event you complain, it’s since you’re a goody-goody idiot.
As White Home Deputy Chief of Employees Stephen Miller stated not way back, “we dwell in a world … that’s ruled by energy, that’s ruled by power, that’s ruled by energy. These are the iron legal guidelines of the world which have existed for the reason that starting of time.” Rubio stated it higher, nevertheless it’s the identical concept.
There are different issues with Rubio’s story. At the beginning of the Nineteen Nineties, the EU’s financial system was 9% larger than ours. In 2025 we have been practically twice as wealthy as Europe. If Europe was “ripping us off,” they’ve a humorous method of exhibiting it. America hasn’t “deindustrialized.” The manufacturing sector has grown throughout all of this decline, although not as a lot because the service sector, the place we’re a behemoth. We’ve got shed manufacturing jobs, however that has extra to do with automation than immigration. Furthermore, the developments Rubio describes will not be distinctive to America. Manufacturing tends to shrink as international locations get richer.
That’s an vital level as a result of Rubio, like his boss, blames all of our financial issues on dangerous politicians and pretends that good politicians can repair them by means of sheer power of will.
I believe Rubio is improper, however I salute him for making his case severely.
