To the editor: The Metropolis Council ought to reverse its determination that declared Marilyn Monroe’s home a historic cultural monument (“L.A. stopped a pair from demolishing Marilyn Monroe’s house. Now, they’re suing,” Feb. 3).
Generally, the general public curiosity in a non-public property outweighs the rights of the property proprietor. That’s not the case with this home.
The house owners are proper after they declare of their lawsuit that there is no such thing as a “precise profit to the general public.”
Monroe was and is liked. And she or he briefly lived on the home earlier than dying there. However these are usually not good causes to justify why the home is a profit to the general public, or why it must be protected at the price of the lack of rights of the house owners.
Nathan Brown, La Crescenta
..
To the editor: Good for plaintiffs Brinah Milstein and Roy Financial institution.
It’s so straightforward for Marilyn Monroe followers to get what they need on another person’s dime. In the event that they need to protect Monroe’s house, they need to purchase it.
David Fink, Los Angeles
