Lawyer Normal Pam Bondi delivers remarks on the Division of Justice on Feb 6, 2026.
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Photos
cover caption
toggle caption
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Photos
Lawyer Normal Pam Bondi is about to testify Wednesday on Capitol Hill the place she’s anticipated to face questions concerning the Justice Division’s concentrating on of President Trump’s political foes and its dealing with of the Epstein information.
Bondi’s look earlier than the Home Judiciary Committee comes one yr into her tenure atop the Justice Division, a tumultuous interval marked by a putting departure from the traditions and norms which have guided the division for many years.
Watch the listening to, set for 10 a.m. ET Wednesday, reside:
Since taking the helm, Bondi has overseen the firing of profession prosecutors and FBI officers who labored on Capitol riot instances or Trump investigations, investigated and prosecuted distinguished opponents of the president, and dropped prosecutions of his allies.
The modifications additionally prolong to the division’s workforce. The part that prosecutes public corruption has been gutted; the Civil Rights Division, which protects the Constitutional rights of all Individuals, has seen a mass exodus of profession attorneys; and a few U.S. Lawyer’s workplaces — together with most not too long ago the one in Minnesota — have been hit by resignations.
In her public appearances, Bondi, who’s a former Florida legal professional normal, has defended the division’s actions, and sought to tout what she says are main accomplishments — going after cartels and violent crime, and serving to within the administration’s immigration enforcement.
She additionally says she’s made “large progress” in the direction of ending what she says was the division’s weaponization lately in opposition to Trump and conservatives. Biden-era DOJ officers deny they politicized the division, they usually level to the prosecutions of distinguished Democratic lawmakers and even President Biden’s son, Hunter, as proof.
Accusations of politicization at DOJ
For many years, the Justice Division has loved a level of independence from the White Home, notably in investigations and prosecutions, to insulate them from partisan politics.
Critics say that below Bondi, that independence has disappeared and the Justice Division has helped enact Trump’s promised marketing campaign of retribution in opposition to his perceived enemies.
Final yr, for instance, the president brazenly directed Bondi to go after former FBI director James Comey and New York Lawyer Normal Letitia James — two high-profile political adversaries of the president.
“We won’t delay any longer, it is killing our popularity and credibility,” Trump mentioned in a social media submit addressed to Bondi. “They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 instances!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!”
Days after that, a brand new appearing U.S. legal professional hand-picked by Trump secured an indictment in opposition to Comey, overruling profession prosecutors who had doubts concerning the energy of the proof.
Just a few weeks later, that very same prosecutor secured an indictment in opposition to James.
Each instances have since been tossed by a federal choose, who discovered that the prosecutor was unlawfully appointed. The Justice Division is interesting that call.
Different perceived opponents of the president or people standing in the way in which of his agenda have additionally discovered themselves below DOJ investigation, together with Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, California Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff, and former Obama-era intelligence officers James Clapper and John Brennan.
Regardless of the uproar from DOJ veterans and lots of authorized consultants, Bondi nonetheless enjoys Trump’s assist — publicly, not less than — in addition to the backing of Republican lawmakers.
She has confronted criticism from some Republicans, nonetheless, over her dealing with of the information of convicted intercourse offender Jeffrey Epstein. The criticism has been targeted on the division’s failure to fulfill the deadline to launch the entire Epstein information, as required by legislation, in addition to the heavy redactions to lots of the paperwork.

