U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Well being and Human Providers Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Administrator for the Facilities for Medicare & Medicaid Providers Mehmet Oz look on throughout a rural well being roundtable on January 16, 2026 in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Photos
cover caption
toggle caption
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Photos
A nationwide experiment to offer well being care in rural America a $50 billion makeover is underway.
The Trump administration, in a late December announcement, revealed how a lot every state will get underneath an bold 5-year initiative often called the Rural Well being Transformation Program.
“This can be a large effort to alter an unlucky actuality that has occurred to rural well being care in America,” Dr. Mehmet Oz, head of the Facilities for Medicare and Medicaid Providers, informed reporters because the awards went out, “which is that your zip code has began to foretell your life expectancy.”
Analysis exhibits persons are extra more likely to die youthful in rural communities in comparison with cities, and the disparity has grown over the past three a long time.
Congress created this new pot of cash final summer time. States got simply 52 days to tug collectively functions and description how they’d use the funding to enhance outcomes, develop the agricultural well being care workforce and drive innovation.
Every state is assured $100 million a 12 months over the subsequent 5 years. The remainder of the cash was awarded primarily based on a sequence of things — together with how rural a state is, what states suggest to do with the cash and whether or not the states undertake insurance policies aligned with the administration’s Make America Wholesome Once more priorities.
There’s bipartisan pleasure about rural well being lastly getting some consideration and funding. Democrats and plenty of well being coverage specialists argue, nevertheless, that this non permanent $50 billion infusion pales as compared to the roughly $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and Obamacare, additionally handed by Congress final 12 months.
“There’s a whole lot of nice issues in these proposals,” stated Kevin Bennett, director of the Middle for Rural and Major Healthcare on the College of South Carolina. “However I believe if we actually wished to rework [rural health care], they’d have gone loads additional.”
Bennett spoke on a panel concerning the new funding co-hosted by the well being coverage information group Tradeoffs and the Leonard Davis Institute of Well being Economics on the College of Pennsylvania.
Listed below are a couple of different key issues to know concerning the Rural Well being Transformation Program:
Why was the Rural Well being Transformation Program created?
Congress added the agricultural funding to President Trump’s large tax and spending invoice — generally known as the Huge Lovely Invoice — handed by Republicans final July. At the final minute, Congress doubled the funds for this system from $25 billion to $50 billion.
The brand new funding was included partly to fulfill some Republicans lawmakers who feared that main cuts to federal Medicaid funding would threaten the viability of rural hospitals. Practically 200 rural hospitals have closed since 2005, and one other 432 are susceptible to closure, based on a latest report.
However the Trump administration pushed states to assume extra broadly about rural well being, telling them they will solely use as much as 15% of this new funding for direct funds to suppliers.
“The aim of this fund is to not pay working bills,” Oz informed reporters in December. “The aim of this $50 billion funding is to permit us to right-size the system and to take care of the elemental hindrances of enchancment in rural well being care.”
How a lot cash did every state obtain?
Awards for the primary 12 months vary from New Jersey’s $147 million to $281 million for Texas.
Massive rural states like Texas, Alaska, California and Montana received probably the most cash, however based on an evaluation from the well being coverage analysis group KFF, some small states like New Jersey, Rhode Island and Massachusetts received considerably extra per rural resident.
Paula Chatterjee, a doctor and researcher on the College of Pennsylvania did an evaluation forward of the awards being introduced that discovered what she known as a “mismatch” in how funds had been focused in comparison with the place the best rural affected person wants are.
“If you happen to have a look at the place funding per rural resident goes underneath this program, it isn’t going to states which have the very best rural mortality charges,” Chatterjee stated on the latest panel. “It isn’t going to states which are projected to have the best reductions in federal Medicaid spending. It isn’t going to locations which are dropping probably the most hospital beds.”
How do states plan to make use of this funding?
A lot of states went after the brand new cash to fund extra telehealth, deploy synthetic intelligence and increase the agricultural well being care workforce.
States took on workforce shortages from many angles. Delaware requested for cash to launch a brand new medical college. Alaska plans to spend funds on housing and youngster take care of its well being care staff. California desires to spend money on a workforce mapping and planning device. Many states stated they’d create extra residency and fellowships for docs and make it simpler for nurses, pharmacists and different well being staff to do extra.
“Quite a lot of the workforce proposals in these are tried and true strategies,” Bennett stated. “Pipeline growth, incentive packages, mortgage reimbursement, all of these kinds of issues we all know could be efficient.”
Will new rural funding make up for anticipated federal Medicaid cuts?
The identical laws that created the Rural Well being Transformation Program additionally lower federal Medicaid spending by almost $1 trillion over the subsequent decade. A KFF evaluation estimates that $137 billion of these cuts will hit rural areas — almost triple the quantity of the brand new rural well being fund.
Rural well being advocates say the looming cuts will depart hospitals struggling to outlive, making it troublesome to totally make the most of the agricultural funding alternative.
“It is actually laborious to consider transformation for those who’re attempting to maintain your doorways open and staff employed and sufferers served,” Bennett stated.
What occurs subsequent?
CMS launched an Workplace of Rural Well being Transformation, which is able to oversee this system and provide assist to states, based on federal well being officers. Most states are planning to have their well being departments or Medicaid places of work handle their new initiatives.
States are anticipated to start out work on their implementation instantly, with awards for 2027 as a result of be introduced in October 2026.
A few of the cash comes with strings. States might get greater awards by promising to undertake well being insurance policies highlighted by the administration in its name for proposals.. But when states fail to go these insurance policies, they are going to obtain much less cash in future years and might be pressured to repay funds they already acquired.
In accordance with federal well being officers, 24 states promised to reinstate the Presidential Health Check in colleges; thirty-three states stated they have already got or would add restrictions to their meals help packages to make it more durable for individuals to purchase soda and different unhealthy gadgets; and 18 states received factors for repealing or limiting certificates of want legal guidelines, which require well being care suppliers to show to state regulators that new providers or services are wanted earlier than they will open up store.
Oz stated he sees this as a device for governors to push insurance policies via probably uncooperative legislatures.
“This isn’t a menace,” Oz stated. “That is truly an empowering component of the One Huge Lovely Invoice.”
