Astronauts have not visited our nearest celestial neighbor since 1972. That is when NASA astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison “Jack” Schmitt spent three days on the moon earlier than rejoining Apollo 17 crewmate NASA astronaut Ron Evans aboard their command module in lunar orbit. After two extra days circling the moon, the trio ignited their engine on a return trajectory again to Earth. As they flew away, theirs grew to become the final units of eyes to see the moon up shut.
Now, after a long time of ever-elongating timelines, evolving mission frameworks and years of delays, NASA is prepared to return. The U.S. house company’s Artemis program faces its second mission in 2026, and it is going to be the primary to hold a crew of astronauts aboard the Orion spacecraft. The Artemis 2 mission is designed to fly its crew as soon as across the moon earlier than returning them to Earth over the course of about 10 days, throughout which the astronauts will develop into the primary in a era to see the moon up shut.
Via its sequence of deliberate Artemis missions, NASA plans to determine a everlasting outpost on the moon. From there, the company hopes to develop and mature the applied sciences wanted to broaden deeper into the photo voltaic system to locations like Mars.
Plenty of U.S. spaceflight discourse this previous yr has targeted on when NASA will get boots on the lunar floor, and whether or not U.S. astronauts will land on the moon’s southern polar area earlier than a bunch of Chinese language taikonauts crops their flag there first. When President Trump’s fiscal yr 2026 finances proposal was launched, the administration put a stronger emphasis on NASA’s human exploration of house — regardless of slicing NASA’s funding by almost 1 / 4 and its science applications just about in half. That emphasis, although, put a highlight on the Artemis program and invited deeper scrutiny of NASA’s launch system and lunar lander improvement.
Underneath NASA’s present plan, Artemis 2 and three depend on the company’s SLS rocket to launch its Orion spacecraft to cislunar house, the place it would dock with the Gateway house station, for switch to a lunar lander for the final leg right down to the floor. NASA’s Human Touchdown Companies (HLS) contract for that automobile was awarded to SpaceX for a model of their Starship automobile at present being developed to move Artemis 3 astronauts right down to the moon’s floor — a controversial choice which elicited business pushback and, extra lately, one which NASA has begun backpedalling on.
Criticisms of each SLS and Starship have referred to as this system’s structure and timeline into query. Earlier than its first launch in 2022, SLS spent greater than a decade in improvement at a price of almost $50 billion since 2006.
Within the time it took to show the SLS design schematics to a totally realized and assembled rocket, SpaceX launched the world to dependable rocket reusability — not one thing SLS was designed for. And, with the profitable restoration and relaunch of SpaceX’s latest Tremendous Heavy booster this yr, some have questioned whether or not SLS’s $4 billion-per-launch price ticket is essentially the most cost-effective method to ship Orion to orbit.
Starship is one other story. SpaceX appears to have labored out a lot of the kinks growing the Tremendous Heavy booster chargeable for launching Starship — although a latest mishap of the booster’s newest model did rupture throughout a pressurization check. The corporate has efficiently caught three Tremendous Heavy boosters utilizing the large “Mechazilla” chopstick-like arms hooked up to the rocket’s launch tower, and managed to refly a type of boosters throughout one in every of Starship’s 2025 check flights. Starship, nonetheless, didn’t have nearly as good a yr.
Of its 5 launches in 2025, Starship solely accomplished its mission goals on the ultimate two. The event delays have raised considerations in regards to the automobile’s readiness for Artemis 3, which NASA had hoped to launch in 2027, however inside SpaceX paperwork obtained by Politico in November point out the corporate would not anticipate Starship to be prepared for that mission till 2028.
U.S. lawmakers, house business leaders and even former NASA directors have spoken out publicly in criticism of Starship’s delayed improvement, and are elevating crimson flags that such delays may hand management of the moon to China.
Throughout testimony earlier than the Senate Commerce Committee in September, former NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine cautioned in opposition to positioning the Artemis program to develop into fully reliant on SpaceX for mission success. “Until one thing modifications, it’s extremely unlikely the US will beat China’s projected timeline,” he stated.
That is an issue, specialists say. The U.S. and China are each eyeing the moon’s southern polar area to arrange camp, the place scientists imagine there may be an abundance of water ice — a worthwhile useful resource that can be utilized to offer astronauts with the whole lot from appropriate ingesting water to rocket gasoline. It is also a matter of nationwide safety. “If our adversaries obtain dominant house capabilities, it will pose a profound danger to America,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) stated throughout the Commerce Committee listening to at which Bridenstine testified.
NASA, too, is feeling the strain. Unhappy with SpaceX’s progress, performing company administrator Sean Duffy introduced in October that NASA was contemplating reopening the HLS contract to different bidders, together with Blue Origin, who objected to Starship’s choice over their Blue Moon lander, which is initially slated for Artemis 5. Now, NASA might resolve to go along with whichever lander is prepared first, however SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has voiced skepticism over the competing firm’s potential to qualify their lander earlier than SpaceX does so with Starship.
For its half, China’s lunar ambitions and timeline to realize them are about on par with the U.S., solely the pace at which they’re growing the applied sciences to perform these targets is shortly worrying these within the U.S. house business who see stalls in Artemis’ evolution.
The query nonetheless stays which nation will efficiently land astronauts (or taikonauts) again on the moon first, however there isn’t any denying which nation would be the first to fly a crew to lunar house within the new millennium.
After Artemis 1, NASA named the crew of the upcoming Artemis 2 flight. The mission will likely be flown by NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman as Artemis 2 commander, Victor Glover as pilot, and Christina Koch and Canadian Area Company astronaut Jeremy Hansen as mission specialists. The quartet has spent the final three years coaching for each facet of their flight across the moon, with a significant ramp-up over the previous yr that has included NASA’s broader Artemis workforce.
“The consolidation and momentum that is constructing within the wider workforce — the flight management workforce, the launch management workforce — we’re firing on all cylinders with these guys doing drawback fixing, answering questions that nobody is aware of the actual reply to,” Koch instructed Area.com in an interview. “Each person who walks into each room is simply able to contribute essentially the most that they will and to get to the best reply as a workforce,” she stated.
Koch and the opposite members of the Artemis 2 crew are desirous to launch on their mission, and if NASA’s present schedule holds, they could get that chance as early as February 2026. NASA is concentrating on no sooner than Feb. 5 for the primary Artemis 2 launch window, and should roll the mission’s accomplished SLS rocket from the Car Meeting Constructing at NASA’s Kennedy Area Heart, to Launch Advanced-39B as early as January. In the event that they run into one other delay, the house company has decided extra launch home windows within the months to observe, by means of April.
As soon as the day of their launch does arrive, the Artemis 2 crew will board the Orion spacecraft and experience SLS into Earth’s orbit for a mission that may final roughly ten days. Ought to the launch go easily and checkouts of Orion’s programs whereas in orbit come again nominal, a translunar injection burn of SLS’s higher stage will propel Orion right into a free-return trajectory across the moon, slingshotting the spacecraft across the moon and again to Earth on a course within the form of a figure-eight. The trajectory would not totally place Orion in lunar orbit, however it ensures the spacecraft and crew’s return to Earth no matter any anomalies they could encounter across the moon.
Whereas the primary goal of Artemis 2 is to place Orion by means of its paces on its first mission carrying astronauts, the crew may even conduct a sequence of science experiments. A few of that analysis includes the astronauts themselves, who will develop into their very own biomedical topics to assemble in-flight information on the results the human physique experiences past low Earth orbit for the primary time since Apollo, together with investigations into issues like radiation publicity and the immune system.
Along with humanity’s long-awaited return to the moon, Artemis 2 is breaking floor in different historic methods as effectively. Relying on when it launches, Orion’s flight across the moon might take the Artemis 2 crew farther from Earth than any earlier crewed mission — doubtlessly breaking the document set throughout Apollo 13.
Koch and Glover may even be making historical past in their very own proper, as the primary girl and first particular person of shade to fly to the moon.
Thus, for all of the uncertainty surrounding Artemis’ long-term structure, Artemis 2 represents one thing far less complicated. It’ll ship people past low Earth orbit for the primary time in additional than half a century, reestablishing a functionality the U.S. at one time might have taken without any consideration.
Whether or not Artemis finally fulfills its promise of sustained lunar exploration, or is reshaped by politics, budgets and competitors with China, this system’s first crewed flight across the moon will mark a definitive turning level. In 2026, humanity is not simply planning to return to lunar house — it is truly going.
