If there was any doubt that the present U.S. administration is the world’s best menace to motion on local weather change, President Trump eliminated it on Sept. 23 when he addressed the U.N. Normal Meeting and known as local weather change “the best con job ever perpetrated on the world” and a menace promoted by “silly individuals.”
He went on to ridicule Europe for decreasing its carbon footprint by 37% and to extol the virtues of “clear, stunning coal.” That’s fairly clear lower, as is the specter of local weather change.
So, the query looms: What are the overwhelming majority of countries that acknowledge the specter of local weather change going to do? Sadly, to this point the reply seems to be “little or no,” however the worldwide group might do one thing, and shortly. Those self same nations that assembled on the U.N. have a weapon at their disposal that might deliver the U.S. again into the fold, a weapon that has been enthusiastically endorsed by Trump, one which might be deployed quickly and can be easy to manage.
Earlier than attending to that, just a little background. Earlier in 2025, the Worldwide Maritime Group, a U.N. company, took a tentative step within the course of worldwide motion on local weather change by proposing a price on fossil gasoline emissions from ships concerned in world commerce, a proposal the group was imagined to formally undertake this fall. Even this timid step — delivery accounts for only one.4% of greenhouse fuel emissions — provoked speedy threats from the Trump administration to impose tariffs or in any other case sanction nations that signed on.
The threats labored — the fractious assembly ended with the vote postponed for a yr — however, with political will from the world’s nations, there’s a straightforward option to counter these threats and make a significant discount in world emissions.
Overlook about piecemeal actions. The worldwide group might conform to a common tariff that may be imposed on these nations that fail to cut back their annual emissions by a specified quantity (3% yearly is smaller than is required to forestall an increase of two levels Celsius from pre-industrial ranges, however in all probability as massive a discount because the worldwide group would settle for). The Trump administration’s divide-and-conquer bluster wouldn’t work on an internationally agreed upon tariff; he can’t impose sanctions on all the world group, or if he did, the ache would largely be felt by the U.S. itself.
A number of businesses and establishments monitor every nation’s emissions, and the tariffs might be administered by the World Commerce Group, which has already declared that local weather change is a matter it should deal with. Cash collected might assist poor nations obtain reductions. Such a tariff would signify motion on the scale wanted. It might be easy to manage, and it wouldn’t contain the infinite, complicated negotiations which have neutered each earlier local weather change initiative and are weak to gaming.
A common tariff is a low-hanging fruit on the local weather motion tree, and the Trump administration’s center finger to the Normal Meeting might be a wanted name to motion because the world continues to sleepwalk right into a local weather catastrophe. Retaining temperatures from rising greater than 1.5 levels Celsius, the primary hazard level specified by the Paris Settlement, is principally a misplaced trigger. The world will see a continued rise in financial and social damages inflicted by excessive storms, droughts, floods, temperatures and wildfires. It’d nonetheless be potential, nonetheless, to forestall the rise in such occasions from persevering with to speed up.
One step towards slowing local weather change can be recognizing that decreasing world emissions represents a chance for the best financial stimulus program of all time because the world shifts its vitality base away from fossil fuels and adjusts improvement and infrastructure priorities to local weather realities.
One other step can be recognizing that no world local weather motion might be potential with out enjoying hardball with the Trump administration, just because any local weather motion might be nullified if the world’s largest economic system makes use of its would possibly to counter these efforts.
Whereas Trump would possibly consider he delivered a triumphant and dominant message to the world leaders gathered on the U.N., the messages acquired had been very completely different. One of many loudest was that the U.S. authorities goes to do every little thing it might probably to hasten a local weather catastrophe. If that doesn’t provoke the worldwide group, nothing will, and the world will proceed to hurtle towards its appointment with local weather future.
Eugene Linden is the creator of “Hearth & Flood: A Folks’s Historical past of Local weather Change From 1979 to the Current.”
Insights
L.A. Instances Insights delivers AI-generated evaluation on Voices content material to supply all factors of view. Insights doesn’t seem on any information articles.
Viewpoint
Views
The next AI-generated content material is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Instances editorial workers doesn’t create or edit the content material.
Concepts expressed within the piece
- The Trump administration stands because the world’s best obstacle to world local weather motion, demonstrated by the president’s specific dismissal of local weather change as a fabrication and condemnation of countries pursuing emissions reductions
- The worldwide group should abandon incremental approaches and implement a unified, binding mechanism somewhat than have interaction in infinite complicated negotiations which have persistently weakened local weather initiatives
- A common tariff imposed on nations failing to attain specified annual emissions reductions would successfully stop the Trump administration’s divide-and-conquer technique from undermining coordinated world motion
- Such a system would leverage present emissions monitoring infrastructure and might be administered via the World Commerce Group with out requiring intricate negotiations weak to manipulation
- Although the 1.5-degree Celsius goal established by the Paris Settlement is functionally unachievable, stopping additional acceleration of local weather disasters stays possible via aggressive worldwide coordination
- The Trump administration have to be confronted instantly via hardball techniques, as any local weather progress might be negated with out addressing its deliberate opposition
- World emissions reductions signify an unprecedented financial stimulus alternative because the world transitions its vitality infrastructure away from fossil fuels
Totally different views on the subject
- Some local weather scientists preserve that extensively cited local weather assessments current worst-case eventualities that require verification towards different datasets somewhat than acceptance at face worth[1]
- Monetary specialists query predictions of imminent market collapse in climate-vulnerable actual property, with distinguished economists suggesting that catastrophic housing defaults and mortgage delinquencies stay comparatively unlikely regardless of rising insurance coverage prices[1]
- Extra optimistic assessments of humanity’s capability to deal with local weather challenges emphasize that enough numbers of gifted professionals are devoted to creating options, positioning civilization to emerge from the local weather disaster into an period of stabilized circumstances[1]
- Some analysts distinguish between rational market-based options to local weather adaptation, the place correct danger pricing naturally encourages migration away from weak areas, and extra interventionist governmental approaches[1]
