To the editor: If the 2nd Modification said that “widespread drunkards” had been to be prohibited from having weapons, then why isn’t this regulation being utilized to the modern-day model of that (“Supreme Courtroom will determine if ‘routine drug customers’ lose their gun rights underneath 2nd Modification,” Oct. 20)?
If these “slender circumstances” calling for limiting gun rights for marijuana and drug customers are utilized as a result of these individuals would possibly “pose a grave threat of armed, hostile encounters with cops whereas impaired,” then they have to apply it to individuals who habitually eat alcohol.
Let’s see the way it works when those that hit the bars lose their open-carry permits.
Andrea Brown, Santa Barbara
