Among the many many audiences Gov. Gavin Newsom has provoked these days, one cohort is especially fired up: menopausal ladies. I do know I felt a rush of adrenaline (or maybe it was a sizzling flash?) once I noticed actor Halle Berry take to Instagram this week to demand the governor make menopause a public coverage precedence.
From Hollywood to Capitol Hill, menopause continues to be having a second. However no entity has succeeded greater than state lawmakers in remodeling all of the buzzy headlines into significant motion.
Earlier this summer time, CNN and NPR declared a “nationwide motion” for menopause legislative exercise, reporting a file 15 states introducing upward of two dozen payments as of July. So speedy and sturdy was this agenda, the digital information outlet Axios dubbed menopause coverage “the brand new tampon tax” — one other seemingly out-of-the-blue however wildly standard reform that swept by way of statehouses lately. (California is one in all 22 states that has repealed gross sales tax on menstrual merchandise over the past decade.)
The momentum was not so surprising to me, although. I’ve written over many years on menstruation and menopause. I’ve engaged firsthand with lawmakers of all political stripes dedicated to those points — for instance, those that handed legal guidelines to ease the burden of the price of interval merchandise. After the 2024 elections, I suspected there may very well be new political will to sort out menopause and embrace insurance policies that would assist ameliorate the challenges of discovering ample care and therapy for all its disruptive signs.
This conviction led me to workforce up with main medical specialists to publish a Citizen’s Information to Menopause Advocacy again in January, with a foreword by the journalist and former California first girl Maria Shriver. We set forth lots of the reforms that states at the moment are embracing — issues like higher training for medical doctors and higher info supplied by public well being departments, improved entry to and insurance coverage protection of menopause therapies, and extra sturdy office protections and lodging.
Right now, seven states have menopause legal guidelines on the books; California is one in all them, having codified assist for restricted persevering with medical training alternatives for suppliers. The tally will certainly develop as a number of extra states tee up new proposals for 2026 — like in Michigan, the place a bipartisan pair of lawmakers just lately filed a number of payments and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer kicked off a listening tour in communities across the state.
Right here and now, all eyes ought to be on California’s newest legislative transfer. A 2025 invoice championed by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, AB 432, now poised for passage, addresses two key wants — affordability of care (requiring medical health insurance plans to cowl menopause therapies) and high quality of care (incentivizing clinicians to include menopause-specific coaching as a part of their skilled licensing persevering with training requirement).
AB 432 is a modified model of prior laws that handed final yr however was vetoed by Newsom, who argued on the time its provisions had been “too far-reaching.” The present legislative language is attentive to his issues, for instance limiting protection to FDA-approved menopause therapies. However there’s no assure of a gubernatorial inexperienced gentle, given statewide infighting over a broader array of medical health insurance practices and insurance policies.
There’s something a lot deeper than a single regulation at stake in California. The state is able to be a frontrunner on menopause points — not a lot within the particular provisions, however within the tradition.
California wouldn’t be the primary state to move the provisions which can be in AB 432. As for insurance coverage protection, Louisiana holds that banner; its legislature grew to become the primary within the nation to require Medicaid and personal medical health insurance plans to cowl perimenopause and menopause therapies. Amongst different states on the fore, Illinois now has a devoted Menopause Consciousness Week, Maine handed funding for state well being division instructional sources, and Rhode Island is the primary to ascertain office lodging protections.
However Newsom’s personal model as a contemporary democracy avenger — California’s function in driving the nationwide redistricting disaster response, the state’s self-proclaimed standing as a secure haven for abortion rights — makes for a ripe alternative to display and articulate that menopause belongs squarely within the pro-democracy discourse too.
Menopausal ladies are a contingent 75 million robust within the U.S. and entitled to accessible, competent healthcare and therapy. Our accrued knowledge and expertise contribute profoundly to the financial system, to tradition, to the physique politic. We’ve each proper to demand lawmakers and political leaders spend money on our well-being, our dignity, our humanity. And we all know that once we battle for ourselves, we additionally battle for our daughters — and for the longer term.
Halle Berry’s marketing campaign is cleverly known as “Flip Up the Warmth.” Who higher than a military of menopausal ladies to take action? Our democracy can be stronger for it.
Jennifer Weiss-Wolf is the manager director of the Birnbaum Girls’s Management Heart at New York College Faculty of Legislation.
Insights
L.A. Instances Insights delivers AI-generated evaluation on Voices content material to supply all factors of view. Insights doesn’t seem on any information articles.
Viewpoint
Views
The next AI-generated content material is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Instances editorial workers doesn’t create or edit the content material.
Concepts expressed within the piece
-
The writer argues that menopause coverage represents a important alternative for California to display management on ladies’s well being points, positioning the state alongside its current function as a “secure haven for abortion rights” and advocate for contemporary democracy. The attitude emphasizes that AB 432 addresses two basic healthcare wants: making menopause therapies extra reasonably priced by way of required insurance coverage protection and bettering care high quality by incentivizing clinician training[1][2].
-
Advocates keep that the present legislative momentum displays a broader “nationwide motion” for menopause coverage, with 15 states introducing over two dozen payments as of summer time 2025, making this difficulty similar to the profitable marketing campaign to get rid of gross sales taxes on menstrual merchandise. The invoice particularly requires protection for analysis and therapy choices for perimenopause and menopause with out utilization administration, as decided medically crucial by treating suppliers[1][2].
-
Supporters emphasize that menopause impacts roughly 50% of the inhabitants but stays inadequately researched and lined by healthcare techniques, creating vital disparities in care significantly for girls of shade who usually expertise extra extreme signs[3][4]. The laws mandates that physicians whose affected person inhabitants is greater than 25% ladies take part in persevering with medical training programs on menopause, addressing regarding gaps in supplier data[3][4].
-
The writer frames menopausal ladies as a strong political constituency of 75 million People who deserve accessible, competent healthcare and argues that investing of their well-being strengthens democratic establishments. This angle positions menopause coverage inside broader pro-democracy discourse, suggesting that supporting this laws advantages not solely present sufferers however future generations[4].
Completely different views on the subject
-
Earlier gubernatorial opposition centered on issues that menopause laws provisions had been “too far-reaching,” resulting in the veto of comparable laws within the prior yr. The present model makes an attempt to deal with these issues by limiting protection particularly to FDA-approved menopause therapies, although uncertainty stays about whether or not these modifications will fulfill administrative objections[1][2].
-
Healthcare coverage analysts observe potential price implications and acknowledge that whereas related well being impacts may very well be anticipated following implementation, “attainable modifications in medical science and different points of well being make stability of impacts much less sure as time goes by.” The evaluation signifies that in 2026, AB 432 would apply to the medical health insurance of roughly 22,207,000 enrollees, suggesting vital fiscal issues[1][2].
-
Considerations exist concerning the persevering with medical training necessities for physicians, significantly the mandate that medical doctors with affected person populations composed of 25% or extra ladies should full menopause coursework. This requirement could probably impression doctor data and luxury ranges but in addition represents further skilled obligations and administrative burdens for healthcare suppliers[1][2].
-
Broader healthcare coverage debates proceed concerning insurance coverage practices and protection mandates statewide, creating political uncertainty round passage of menopause-specific laws. The invoice’s success stays contingent on navigating these bigger healthcare coverage disputes and securing gubernatorial approval regardless of earlier resistance to related measures[1][2].