What Occurred: Greystar, the nation’s largest landlord, has agreed to cease utilizing algorithmic rent-setting software program that federal prosecutors say may violate legal guidelines in opposition to price-fixing.
The settlement is a part of a proposed settlement with the Justice Division to resolve claims by federal authorities that the corporate had colluded with different landlords to boost rents in cities throughout the nation.
The deal was introduced by the DOJ on Friday however nonetheless should be permitted by a decide. Whether it is, it’s going to bar Greystar, which is predicated in South Carolina and manages practically 950,000 residences nationwide, from utilizing any “anti-competitive” algorithm that depends on rivals’ delicate information to recommend rents, the division stated in an announcement.
Greystar was utilizing rent-setting algorithms from RealPage, a Texas-based software-maker who was the topic of a ProPublica investigation in 2022 that confirmed the agency was serving to landlords determine costs in a manner that authorized consultants stated may lead to cartel-like habits. The DOJ has additionally sued RealPage.
What They Stated: The settlement drew reward from each Republicans and Democrats.
The lawsuit started below the Biden administration, however Trump-appointed Legal professional Common Pam Bondi touted the settlement with Greystar final week, saying “nowhere is competitors extra necessary than in making housing reasonably priced once more.”
Assistant Legal professional Common Abigail Slater, head of DOJ’s Antitrust Division, stated that “whether or not in a smoke-filled room or via an algorithm, opponents can’t share competitively delicate data or align costs to the detriment of American customers.”
The settlement was praised by Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who urged the DOJ to research anticompetitive practices within the condominium market after ProPublica’s story in 2022.
“This settlement is nice information for renters throughout the nation,” Klobuchar stated in an announcement. “It’s vital the Justice Division continues to prosecute the case in opposition to RealPage and different main landlords to supply reduction for all renters.”
Response: Greystar didn’t admit wrongdoing as a part of the settlement and stated in an announcement that it “firmly believes that its use of RealPage’s income administration software program complies with all relevant legal guidelines.” The corporate stated it’s going to proceed to defend itself in opposition to claims introduced by regulators and cited what it known as “unclear regulatory steerage round the usage of income administration instruments.”
“We entered into these settlements to clarify the federal government’s interpretation of the legislation and to make sure we proceed to do issues the proper manner,” Greystar stated.
Greystar additionally introduced it had reached “an settlement in precept” to settle litigation introduced by a nationwide group of renters making related allegations.
A Greystar spokesperson declined to remark additional.
RealPage declined to remark.
In January, a RealPage government known as the federal case “flawed” and stated the corporate was dedicated to “vigorously defending ourselves.” RealPage had already modified its software program to take away nonpublic information, she stated, regardless of its view that its know-how was authorized and “pro-competitive,” including the corporate was being made a scapegoat for housing affordability issues stemming from an undersupply of housing inventory.
Background: The proposed settlement is the most recent growth to comply with ProPublica’s 2022 investigation, which additionally talked about Greystar. Dozens of tenants sued RealPage after the preliminary story. The Justice Division filed an antitrust criticism in opposition to RealPage in August 2024, and in January, it sued six of the nation’s landlords, together with Greystar, accusing them of improperly working collectively to boost rents. Of their criticism, prosecutors stated one landlord instructed RealPage that it began growing rents inside per week of adopting the software program and, inside 11 months, had raised them greater than 25%.
The go well with was joined by not less than 10 attorneys basic, together with the one for California, the nation’s most populous state — residence to roughly 17 million renters. One different landlord, Atlanta-based Cortland, has agreed to a settlement, as nicely.
Senators have additionally held hearings and launched laws looking for to ban the usage of hire algorithms much like RealPage’s. Cities across the nation, together with San Francisco, Philadelphia and Minneapolis, moved to bar landlords from utilizing related algorithms to set rents.
Below the phrases of the proposed settlement, Greystar has agreed to cease sharing its personal “competitively delicate” data with rival firms. And it received’t attend conferences of opponents hosted by RealPage.
Why It Issues: The DOJ’s strikes in opposition to RealPage — and its landlord clients — for utilizing shared information and know-how have been seen as a sign that authorities have been prepared to wade right into a fraught nook of federal antitrust legislation. Previously, collusion occurred with “a proper handshake in a clandestine assembly,” federal prosecutors wrote in a single submitting. “Algorithms are the brand new frontier.”
The proposed settlement can also be vital as companies watch to see how aggressively the Trump administration will pursue antitrust instances. Bondi stated the settlement aligned with the president’s “pro-consumer agenda.”
Now, as a part of the deal, Greystar has agreed to cooperate with the DOJ’s monopolization claims in opposition to RealPage. The case is ongoing. RealPage has sought to dismiss the go well with, saying “it fails to plead anticompetitive results in a related market,” amongst different issues.
Mariam Elba contributed analysis.
