Gov. Maura Healey knew a migrant tsunami was coming, however as an alternative of steering the ship of state into deeper waters for security, she headed for the dock.
The fiscal harm has been near $2 billion.
Because the Herald reported, Gov. Charlie Baker’s administration provided a written warning to Healey a couple of surge of migrants and dwindling state shelter capability in November 2022, months earlier than she took workplace, in keeping with a transition doc accredited by Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Kennealy when he was secretary of housing and financial improvement.
That was greater than a 12 months after President Joe Biden had began reversing Donald Trump’s restrictions on immigration when he took workplace. As Pew Analysis famous in 2022, Biden’s plans included boosting refugee admissions, preserving deportation aid for unauthorized immigrants who got here to the U.S. as youngsters and never implementing the “public cost” rule that denies inexperienced playing cards to immigrants who may use public advantages like Medicaid.
It labored. The border was porous, the variety of migrants soared.
The Baker Administration knew issues may go south for the state. That written warning largely targeted on the necessity to broaden shelter capability and supply extra funding to the emergency help program. Whereas hindsight is 20/20, this warning ought to have spurred Healey to maintain the pink carpet within the closet.
However Healey upheld the “presumptive eligibility” a part of the state’s right-to-shelter regulation. That’s the place shelter candidates are presumed to be eligible for shelter and obtain shelter advantages earlier than producing obligatory documentation.
Massachusetts issued driver’s licenses no matter immigration standing, and the Healey Administration pulled out the stops to get work authorizations for migrants.
Massachusetts was a beneficiant port within the storm. Not less than till the fact that prompted Baker’s warning letter set in.
By then the state had already taken a beating; communities had been “chosen” to deal with migrant shelters, prefer it or not. Migrants had been arrested for often-heinous crimes, and the invoice to taxpayers stored mounting.
Healey acquired on board, finally. In 2023 she issued a state of emergency, a couple of 12 months after she acquired that warning letter. Healey additionally issued a nine-month size of keep coverage for the state’s Emergency Help Household Shelter System, in June of ’24.
And in March of this 12 months, Healey directed that every one adults making use of for Emergency Help shelter are required to endure a CORI verify, along with SORI and warrant checks. Underneath these new rules, people is not going to be eligible for EA in the event that they fail to consent to a CORI verify or if they’ve been convicted of a critical crime, like homicide, arson, kidnapping, rape and felonies in opposition to youngsters. This is able to have been good to have in place earlier than alleged youngster rapists had been arrested in emergency shelters.
Lastly, Healey eradicated presumptive eligibility. Shelter candidates are actually required to confirm their id, residency, and standing previous to placement.
Massachusetts taxpayers shouldn’t have needed to journey out Healey’s coverage evolutions. The modifications she finally made are frequent sense. Preserve communities secure, make shelter stays a stop-gap measure as an alternative of a long-term residence.
And final 12 months’s journey by administration officers to Texas to unfold the “Massachusetts is full” message? That was a couple of 12 months too late.
Healey owes taxpayers an apology — after which some.
Initially Revealed:
