PK Kemsley’s funds are as soon as once more on the heart of his divorce battle with estranged spouse Dorit Kemsley as they struggle over spousal and youngster help.
The Actual Housewives of Beverly Hills star, 50, filed new paperwork of their authorized case, which included a licensed public accountant’s declaration of the music supervisor’s revenue and spending habits.
In keeping with the declaration dated July 30 and completely obtained by Us, Aaron Garrett, who was employed by Dorit’s authorized staff, alleged that PK, 58, “borrowed $350,000 in November 2024 which was as a consequence of be repaid in November 2025.”
Garrett famous that “primarily based on the documentation acquired up to now, it doesn’t seem that this alleged mortgage was repaid.” He additionally acknowledged that PK allegedly has $821,937 in unknown deposits that the British businessman has asserted are loans.
PK Kemsley, Dorit Kemsley Charles Sykes/Bravo/NBCU Photograph Financial institution through Getty Photographs
“PK represents that he has acquired loans within the post-separation interval. We have now not acquired documentation reflecting the reimbursement of those alleged loans,” the paperwork filed in court docket on Tuesday, August 4, learn. “The opposite inflows that PK characterizes as ‘loans’ are inbound transfers and deposits acquired from worldwide and home accounts, which we’ve got not acquired statements for. It’s unclear if these funds had been acquired from accounts in PKs identify (which he has not disclosed), third events, or enterprise entities. We additional be aware that PK doesn’t disclose any excellent obligations in his up to date Earnings and Expense Declaration, nor has he produced documentation supporting the identical. We have now attributed these inflows to PK as revenue pending documentation supporting the obligations or reimbursement.”
The forensic accountant additionally declared that PK has withdrawn over $100,000 in money over the past two years and spent “roughly $435,000 on journey and eating” since transferring out of their marital residence.
“Dorit has not acquired youngster or spousal help for the reason that date of separation. Since vacating the residence, PK has spent the vast majority of his time overseas and lived a lavish life-style,” Garrett claimed, whereas supporting Dorit’s month-to-month demand for $21,086 in youngster help and an extra $22,330 in spousal help. The Bravolebrity additional claims that PK “has assumed little duty for the youngsters’s day-to-day care,” leaving her to “shoulder just about all parenting obligations.”
Her CPA discovered that PK’s “revenue for the 24 months ending March 31, 2026 is no less than $3,869,620” and Dorit’s annual revenue is $548,970. (Her RHOBH wage was included however redacted within the paperwork.)
Us reached out to each events’ attorneys for remark.
Paul “PK” Kemsley fired again at estranged spouse Dorit Kemsley’s claims that her contract for The Actual Housewives of Beverly Hills can clarify her so-called “extreme” spending habits. “Her contract doesn’t state any requirement to replace and keep her wardrobe, make up and hair as a situation for her employment,” PK, 58, alleged in […]
PK and Dorit have been at battle since April 2025 when she filed for divorce after 10 years of marriage. She cited “irreconcilable variations” as the explanation behind their break up and requested a choose to award her sole authorized and bodily custody of their two youngsters: son Jagger, 12, and daughter Phoenix, 9.
PK has slammed Dorit for allegedly spending $1 million on designer items for RHOBH and claiming she takes care of their youngsters 95 % of the time. Dorit denied the spending declare, stating that she returned a number of the gadgets. In her declaration, nevertheless, the fact star revealed she spent $217,000 on her season 15 wardrobe.
In the meantime, the exes aren’t simply combating over custody and help.
Dorit and PK are additionally at odds over their once-shared residence, which she and their youngsters have occupied since their break up in Might 2024.
She accused PK of failing to pay the mortgage on their residence, regardless of allegedly promising to take action, leading to foreclosures notices.
PK has expressed his need to promote the house, arguing that an instantaneous, court-ordered sale of the property is critical to protect the remaining fairness within the residence. Dorit requested the choose to disclaim his request.
In court docket paperwork filed final month, Dorit claimed her estranged husband is making an attempt to “egregiously misuse Household Code 2108” in an try and “side-step trial” and proceed to allegedly forgo making their mortgage funds. She argued that his actions would “render his spouse and youngsters homeless.”
