NPR’s Michel Martin speaks with New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen about President Trump on the NATO summit and extra strikes within the struggle with Iran.
Transcript
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
Let’s hear from Senator Jeanne Shaheen now. She is the highest Democrat on the Senate Overseas Relations Committee. She’s additionally a senior member of the Senate Armed Companies Committee and he or she co-chairs the bipartisan Senate NATO Observer Group. We needed to listen to her tackle President Trump’s shifting stance on Iran. So the senator is on the road now with us from Budapest, following the NATO summit in Ankara. Senator, welcome again to this system.
JEANNE SHAHEEN: Nicely, thanks. It is good to be with you. And we had a bipartisan bicameral delegation in Ankara, as we all the time do for the NATO summit, and I believe it is an vital message to all of our allies in regards to the congressional help for NATO.
MARTIN: So on Monday afternoon, the president described the struggle for CBS Information as, quote, “just about full.” By yesterday afternoon, U.S. airstrikes had resumed. Now, clearly, you understand, Iran is a participant on this, making their very own selections about their very own conduct. However do you will have any visibility into the president’s intentions in Iran at this level?
SHAHEEN: Nicely, sadly, I do not, and I am unsure the American folks do, both. The very fact is, it is a struggle that he by no means ought to have undertaken. Not one of the targets that he set out to start with have been achieved. We have not seen regime change. In reality, we’ve got a extra hard-line regime in place. They nonetheless have a major variety of their ballistic missiles.
They’ve now managed the – they nonetheless have all of their nuclear materials, and there hasn’t been a call about methods to deal with that, and now they management the Strait of Hormuz in ways in which have stopped business delivery to the remainder of the world. So it is a struggle that should finish. The president must get again to the negotiating desk, however he wants to barter a deal that is going to profit america and never Iran.
MARTIN: What do you assume it will take to get again to the negotiating desk?
SHAHEEN: Nicely, I do assume a follow-up to the Iranian strikes towards our allies and towards delivery within the strait is a vital response from america, and hopefully that may encourage the Iranians that it is time now to sit down down on the desk and negotiate.
MARTIN: So let’s speak about one other vital battle, which can be clearly a topic of nice concern at NATO. I imply, the president now says the U.S. would permit Ukraine to fabricate Patriot air protection programs. He additionally says the corporate that makes the interceptors is not but on board. Do you will have a way of what must occur earlier than Ukraine makes these subtle interceptor missiles?
SHAHEEN: Nicely, I do assume it is vital to be sure that RTX, the corporate that makes these interceptors and the Patriot system, is on board with no matter’s decided. However I do assume it is crucial for us to try to do every part we will to help Ukraine to get these interceptors as Russia continues to assault their civilian inhabitants and infrastructure.
Now, the momentum has shifted in Ukraine, and I used to be very happy with the end result of the NATO summit with respect to help for Ukraine, with respect to Trump signing on to the communique and the actual change that is occurred on that struggle. We have to put extra stress on Russia to get them to the negotiating desk in order that there is usually a deal to finish the struggle that advantages Ukraine and prevents additional battle sooner or later.
MARTIN: Any perception into why the president reversed his place on licensing Ukraine for manufacturing these Patriot protection programs?
SHAHEEN: I do not. However I do assume there was a whole lot of dialogue. One of many issues that we all know from the struggle in Ukraine is that our protection industrial base, each in america and amongst our NATO allies, will not be as sturdy as we want it to be as we’re taking a look at potential conflicts sooner or later. And so a giant matter of debate on the NATO summit was co-production – how will we higher cooperate amongst allies to make sure that we’ve got what we want? And clearly, Patriot missiles and interceptors is among the huge issues that we want.
And one factor we have realized from the Ukrainians on this struggle is that they’re probably the most technologically superior. They’re probably the most revolutionary of any nation in Europe proper now. They don’t seem to be only a person of kit and weapons from america, however they’re a supplier, as we noticed within the struggle in Iran. So it’s in our – to our profit to make sure that we work with them and study from what they’re innovating.
MARTIN: I wish to return to a few of the president’s language whereas at NATO. I imply, he known as the Spanish hopeless, unhealthy folks. He lashed out at allies for failing to totally help the struggle in Iran. He revisited the thought of the U.S. controlling Greenland. As you heard from Franco’s piece, he did say that he felt that there was, you understand, heat and respect there as effectively. However he – however once more, you add that to what he mentioned about Iran’s leaders. And I am simply questioning, you’ve got been going to NATO conferences for a very long time. You’ve your individual relationships with lots of the leaders there. I am simply questioning what you assume they took away from that.
SHAHEEN: I believe our NATO allies have discovered that the president will not be constant in his international coverage or his statements, and that they’re shifting ahead – the communique that got here out of the NATO summit, I believe, was very optimistic, as I mentioned on Ukraine, on the dedication to work collectively, the give attention to co-production. And all of that’s what’s vital. We met with a lot of leaders of NATO international locations, and we did not hear anyone who actually mentioned something in regards to the president as a result of I believe individuals are used to his mercurial and inconsistent response. And, you understand, in plenty of methods, that is unlucky as a result of meaning individuals are ignoring what he has to say.
MARTIN: So that you assume they only do not take it severely?
SHAHEEN: I believe folks do not take a whole lot of it severely.
MARTIN: Nicely, so earlier than we allow you to go, I do wish to ask in regards to the Senate race in Maine, your neighboring state. You noticed that Graham Platner introduced he’ll droop his marketing campaign. Do you assume that this…
SHAHEEN: I did.
MARTIN: Do you assume that Democrats nonetheless have an opportunity to win again the Senate?
SHAHEEN: I believe there are a whole lot of actually good Democratic candidates in states throughout the nation, and they’re working very onerous. And so we do have a very good likelihood to win again the Senate. And I believe there shall be a candidate in Maine who will run a very good race.
MARTIN: That’s U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen. She’s a Democrat from New Hampshire and the rating member of the Overseas Relations Committee, and he or she was a part of this bipartisan bicameral group that accompanied the NATO mission. Senator Shaheen, thanks a lot.
SHAHEEN: Good to speak to you. Thanks.
Copyright © 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might fluctuate. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.
